On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 07:32:48PM +, Namespace wrote:
void glCheck(lazy void func, string file = __FILE__, uint line =
__LINE__) {
func();
glCheckError(file, line);
}
How can I specify that 'func' is @nogc? Or can define the
function otherwise?
Try
void
Tobias Pankrath wrote:
writefln(stack: %s, stack[]); //fine
This call consumes all ranges stored in stack, so they're empty afterwards.
ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:09:50 +0300, Ivan Timokhin wrote:
Is there any way to pass a delegate that:
1. avoids indirect calls (like alias);
2. does not allocate (like scope delegate);
3. captures local variables?
i don't think that you can do it. but what is wrong with
With dmd 2.066.1, this compiles:
void bar(scope int delegate() a) @nogc {}
void foo(int x) @nogc
{
bar(() = x);
}
but this doesn't:
void bar(alias a)() {}
void foo(int x) @nogc
{
bar!(() = x)();
}
Fails with
Error: function test.foo @nogc function allocates a closure with the GC
Is
ref2401 wrote:
Does D provide a way for explicit interface implementation?
[C#] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173157.aspx
Not exactly, but you may try something like this:
interface A
{
void foo();
}
interface B
{
void foo();
}
class C : A
{
class Nested : B
{
02.09.2014 23:21, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= schue...@gmx.net пишет:
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 18:55:50 UTC, Ivan Timokhin wrote:
Is it possible to get all overloads of an operator for a particular type?
I.e., having this struct definition, is it possible to tell at compile
time that
Is it possible to get all overloads of an operator for a particular type?
I.e., having this struct definition, is it possible to tell at compile
time that it can be added with double and int[]?
struct S
{
void opBinary(string op : +)(double);
void opBinary(string op : +)(int[]);
}
To
