== Quote from Adam D. Ruppe (destructiona...@gmail.com)'s article
> The problem with BSD/GPL code in the main Phobos is any D program will link
> with
> it, and thus the license goes viral to all D programs.
> But since this is just interface files, separate from the stdlib aside from
> sharing a
== Quote from Sean Kelly (s...@invisibleduck.org)'s article
>> In Go code, the only place you typically see semicolons is
>> separating the clauses of for loops and the like; they are not
>> necessary after every statement
> To me, what they're saying is that their syntax is broken and so it
> for
== Quote from div0 (d...@sourceforge.net)'s article
> On 12/11/2010 13:21, div0 wrote:
> > On 12/11/2010 04:01, jfd wrote:
> >>
> >> Help, anyone? Thank you.
> >
> > The easiest way is to simply compile a one liner C module.
> > Then you get all t
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
>> eaturbrainz
>> Back in the day I was writing a kernel, and having to
>> rewrite queues for every single type of thing I wanted
>> to queue, or use type-casts to enforce strong typing
>> of queue elements at runtime, was
I was trying to translate Apache module include files to D, but it soon leads
to a labyrinth of tangled nested #includes and #define and typedef's. The
tools, `dmc -c -e -l', htod, etc. immediately choked. It is getting really,
really,... time consuming, and the words "man years" flashes before m
Any thoughts on parallel programming. I was looking at something about Chapel
and X10 languages etc. for parallelism, and it looks interesting. I know that
it is still an area of active research, and it is not yet (far from?) done,
but anyone have thoughts on this as future direction? Thank you.
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
> On 2010-11-09 01:37, JFD wrote:
> > Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
> >
> > One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've
> > figure
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
> On 2010-11-10 20:12, Steve Teale wrote:
> > In the Apache mod_d thread I saw:
> >
> > gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libhello.so.0 -o libhello.so.0.0 libhello.a
> >
> > Has anyone tried this with libphobos2.a?
> Phobos cannot currently be used as a dy
> Can't DMD already compile D code embedded in HTML:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/html.html ?
I tried the sample at the link, but got error. I also tried it without the HTML
code inside. Am I missing something?
$ dmd hello.html
Error: module hello html source files is deprecated hello.htm
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a "C" function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expects .so shared library, and one co
A potential "mod_d" Apache module would go a long way to promote D language to
the web application world.
But it seems that implementing a "mod_d" Apache module may require that C
instantiates a D language interpreter (similar to Py_NewInterpreter() for
Python), or do the functionality of RDMD wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
