Walter Bright wrote:
> nobody wrote:
>> Linus Torvalds shows his opinion about why he chooses C here:
>> http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/index.cfm?action=detail&id=110618&threadid=110549&roomid=2
>>
>>
>> He wants a language that context-free, simple, down to the metal.
>> He dislikes C++ b/c i
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> bearophile Wrote:
>
>> Walter Bright:
>>> I posted a comment. We'll see.
>>> http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/index.cfm?action=detail&id=110634&threadid=110549&roomid=2
>>
>> This is a part of what Linus said about C++:
>>> It tries to solve all the wrong problems, and
>
bearophile wrote:
> Walter Bright:
>> I posted a comment. We'll see.
>> http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/index.cfm?action=detail&id=110634&threadid=110549&roomid=2
>
> This is a part of what Linus said about C++:
>> It tries to solve all the wrong problems, and
>> does not tackle the right ones.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> nobody wrote:
>>> Linus Torvalds shows his opinion about why he chooses C here:
>>> http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/index.cfm?action=detail&id=110618&threadid=110549&roomid=2
>>>
>>>
>>> He wants a language that contex
Walter Bright wrote:
> nobody wrote:
>> Linus Torvalds shows his opinion about why he chooses C here:
>> http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/index.cfm?action=detail&id=110618&threadid=110549&roomid=2
>>
>>
>> He wants a language that context-free, simple, down to the metal.
>> He dislikes C++ b/c i
BCS wrote:
> Hello Jer,
>
>> (I am kinda feeling sorry for you).
>
> Why?
Shut up. I ask the questions.
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Leandro Lucarella, el 9 de junio a las 11:37 me escribiste:
>> Pelle, el 9 de junio a las 13:28 me escribiste:
Yes, I agree that "safety" is the best argument in favour of
exceptions (as explicitness is the best argument in favour of
no-exceptions). The P
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Leandro Lucarella" wrote in message
> news:20100609162223.gc16...@burns.springfield.home...
>>
>> BTW, here is a PhD thesis with a case against exceptions. I didn't
>> read it (just have a peek) and it's rather old (1982), so it might
>> be not that interesting, but I tho
Ruslan Nikolaev wrote:
> Note: I posted this already on runtime D list, but I think that list
> was a wrong one for this question. Sorry for duplication :-)
>
> Hi. I am new to D. It looks like D supports 3 types of characters:
> char, wchar, dchar. This is cool,
It's wrong, actually.
bearophile wrote:
> Found with Reddit. The LLDB Debugger (LLVM-based):
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/www/index.html?revision=105619
> That article contains some hype. But eventually a D support (for LDC)
> can be added to LLDB too.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
Who ARE you?? Why do you
10 matches
Mail list logo
