Remark 1: I understand that your mixin will be expanded into
cascaded if...else statements. It would probably be more
efficient to expand into switch...case, don't you think?
Oh! I've just figured out that it is not a mixin, but a function
template.
Thanks Philippe! Great solution!
I have two remarks.
Remark 1: I understand that your mixin will be expanded into
cascaded if...else statements. It would probably be more
efficient to expand into switch...case, don't you think?
Remark 2: I infer from your code that the "delegate" keyword is
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 10:40:12 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
I think this should be possible, look for eg. to std.bitmanip
bitfields template
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 09:47:55 UTC, Jerome wrote:
No answer. Should I assume that it is not possible?
That's something that could be
OK. I have done my homework and answered my own question based on
the Duff's Device example in the Language Reference page for
Mixins.
The solution (not variadic though) would be:
mixin template Select!(alias value,
alias if0, alias then0,
alias if1, alias then1,
alias if2, alias then2,
No answer. Should I assume that it is not possible?
That's something that could be done in C with a simple macro. I
really would like to know to what extent mixins are a replacement
for C macros for generating boilerplate code.
Hi!
This is a question from a complete newbie.
Is there a way to replace switch...case statements by a mixin
template, maybe a variadic mixin template (does such a thing
exist?).
What I would want to achieve is to have this kind of syntax:
mixin Select!(value,
if0, { then0(); },
if1, {
