On Saturday, 2 January 2016 at 11:31:24 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
...
* How stable is D? Can one use it without fear that the next
version will significantly change the language and therefore
one would have to rewrite?
...
I recently discover a problem with breakage when trying to
compi
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 14:48:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Often when you see breakage it's the compiler actually
enforcing a pre-existing rule that the code in question broke.
So that made me think, there is any flag that I could turn on,
and pass by over those errors?
JerryR.
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 16:05:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
But 2.060 was released in 2012...
Yes I know it's old but and the reason was to avoid breakage that
already had happened before.
I know that sometimes this (Breakage) is inevitable as the
language grows, but my concern here is
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 05:50:06 UTC, Israel wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 04:06:40 UTC, JerryR wrote:
A couple of months ago, I decided to upgrade my DMD to a new
version: 2.066, and today I needed compile that project again,
which a year ago I had compiled with DMD 2.060.
A couple of months ago, I decided to upgrade my DMD to a new
version: 2.066, and today I needed compile that project again,
which a year ago I had compiled with DMD 2.060.
Now if you look below you will see the errors that I'm getting
with changing from DMD 2.060 to 2.066, and all the errors a
