On 25/06/11 00:50, Khint Enco wrote:
Misfire! No, that 'patch' does nothing ..
I've added a -nosync flag to the compiler (v2.053) that removes all the
effects of synchronized. It has been tested and I ran all unittests, or
at least I think I did .. it took less than half a sec
On 24/06/11 13:04, d coder wrote:
Would the patch you sent still work?
Regards
- Puneet
Misfire! No, that 'patch' does nothing .. admittedly I'm still finding
my way through the compiler source. It looks like I simply skipped the
semantic check for the synchronized storage class .. or somet
On 24/06/11 09:57, d coder wrote:
Hello List
I am working on an application where I would normally be using
multithreading. But sometimes, depending on how much data sharing is
being shared, I might want to invoke the same application in
single-threaded mode.
Now when I invoke it in single-thre
