On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 13:10:20 UTC, Stefan wrote:
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 12:57:59 UTC, Ben wrote:
Let me know if you are interested in taking part in this or
any future Berlin based events.
Hi, another Sociomantic developer checking in. This sounds like
a great idea, I will
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 15:29:58 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 12:57:59 UTC, Ben wrote:
I am interested in organizing some meetups for D programmers
in the nearby area. The first of these will be very informal
and involve a social meeting at a cafe or bar to c
On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:22:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:15:45 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 10:14:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 18:35:26 UTC, Messenger wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 15:33:36 UTC, Orvid Ki
On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:15:45 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 10:14:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 18:35:26 UTC, Messenger wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 15:33:36 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
After all of that, I intend to include a base dra
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 12:25:35 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On 14/03/15 18:31, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I was looking at easy installation of dmd on ubuntu, and found
this:
http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/
Should we make it part of the official distribution?
It
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 23:26:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
And if you suggest to build both test and normal build as
part of single
compiler call (building test version silently in the
background) this is
also very confusing addition hardly worth its gain.
Making the format of unittest failures
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 10:17:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/6/2018 1:58 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
The entire point of making assert a core language feature was
so that the compiler could take advantage of it to generate
better code. It's been like that for D since day 1. It h
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 15:58:12 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On the flip side, it would be great for development, feature
not yet done but planned? Annotate it. Even before a release
ever happens.
This is not the intended usage of this DIP. The intention here is
to only mark symbols that
On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 at 12:33:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Really, what you are doing is reserving the overload spot. In
cases where the overload would have selected your local
function, then you should get no warning (as the additional
symbol won't conflict). In cases where your fu
