https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_smoke
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:42 PM, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 12:17:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
>> I seriously doubt a fan would stop an electrical fire (in fact, probably
>> mak
Maybe not good quality, but I like this one for my ludic purposes:
https://github.com/lmbarros/sbxs_dlang/blob/master/src/sbxs/rand/rng.d#L283
It is an implementation of an approximation algorithm that used to be
described here:
http://home.online.no/~pjacklam/notes/invnorm/
But appears to
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 17/06/15 21:02, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> If it looks like this, it's mine.
>>
>>
>> http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article8435194.ece/alternates/w620/Goldfinger.jpg
>>
>>
> Can you
Not a naming suggestion, but a suggestion for a guideline on how to chose
names: make it simpler for most users.
If we still want one million users:
1. Most of them will never bother with std.allocator (by which I don't mean
it is not necessary!)
2. Of those relatively few using std.allocator, mo
I didn't give much attention to the details. but I like the spirit very
much.
LMB
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Have you ever done:
>
> if(something) {
>import std.conv;
>throw new Exception("some error " ~ to!s
I've not being following this list too closely, so forgive me if this has
been discussed before. Here's a simple suggestion that maybe could improve
D docs a bit.
Perhaps, psychologically, the worst about the docs is that the function
signature is used as a kind of section title. What about just r
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 1/1/15 10:45 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
>> On 29/12/14 05:13, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>>> I did want to say something about this. I'v
Looks very nice! I think I could make use of it. (Though I use D only
recreationally :-) )
LMB
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Shammah Chancellor via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> It was request that I create a NG thread about a module I was hoping to
> merge with phobo
Hello,
I'm coming late to the discussion, but I believe that you can use the
following idiom to achieve the same results in a different way:
class C
{
// This is not overridable
public final void doStuff()
{
doSomethingWhichNeverChanges();
doExtraStuff();
}
protected v
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Jesse Phillips <
jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
> You should probably file a bug. I think this change should be valid (it
> sounds like it wouldn't work, but didn't test)
>
There it is: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12014
LMB
e
been ignored given some forum issues last week -- when it appeared, it was
already buried under several more recent messages.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
> Hello!
>
> About a month ago I asked in D.learn about the expected behavior of the
> ne
Hello!
About a month ago I asked in D.learn about the expected behavior of the new
package.d feature [1]. I got a cuple of responses, but not really answers.
Today I noticed a second post [2] with similar but still unanswered
questions. So it seemed like a good idea to bring the discussion to the
Thanks for the comment! I noticed this wouldn't compile, though I
haven't really wondered why so. My email was more about the compiler
bug than about using alias this with singletons.
Anyway, while trying to circumvent the compiler bug, I did this:
import std.stdio;
class SImpl
{
void foo()
Hello,
I was toying with the idea of adding an 'alias instance this' to a
low-lock singleton, to allow calling MySingleton.method(), instead of
MySingleton.instance.method().
When I tried this, however, DMD 2.062 crashed. Under Linux, after
chewing the code for a long time, it exits with "Error:
*Great!* Thanks for posting this!
I think it will be much easier to get a critical mass of enthusiastic
D developers if we have some sort of "Effective D" (like Scott Meyer's
"Effective C++") book/conf presentations/wiki page/whatever.
This kind of stuff would fit in the "talk proposal for someon
Hello everyone!
Well, this is actually a "talk proposal for someone else". I'd be the
audience, not the speaker.
TITLE: D Programming in D (Or: Writing idiomatic D code)
ABSTRACT: Every language has its own sanctified idioms. Beginners
learning a new language tend to use the idioms of the langua
16 matches
Mail list logo
