Re: Vibe.d - very low performance

2017-07-14 Thread Marek via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 7 July 2017 at 19:03:52 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: I think that vibe.d didn't take full advantage of multi core, even when enabling threading support. Ruby, or rather Rails, applications are usually run using multiple processes, which allows to scale on a multi core CPU. You can do t

Re: Vibe.d - very low performance

2017-07-07 Thread Marek via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 10:57:31 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: This is a scalability issue, which should hopefully be fixed with 0.8.0. I'll open a PR once that is out. Basically with the version that was used in the last benchmark round, it didn't scale at all, and they use a server with many c

Vibe.d - very low performance

2017-07-06 Thread Marek via Digitalmars-d
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext C++, Java and Go frameworks have very high performance. Vibe.d is supposed to have similar performance, but in fact vibe.d performance is very low. Why?

Re: readln and readf issues

2016-11-11 Thread Jacob Marek via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 10:05:14 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: Dne 11.11.2016 v 10:43 Jacob Marek via Digitalmars-d napsal(a): Hi! so I'm probably being dumb here however I'm having an issue getting readf and readln to work properly. It seems to be superseding the rest of my code

readln and readf issues

2016-11-11 Thread Jacob Marek via Digitalmars-d
Hi! so I'm probably being dumb here however I'm having an issue getting readf and readln to work properly. It seems to be superseding the rest of my code. Allow me to explain. No matter where I put the readf/readln function it will get hung up in the console waiting for input. An example is bel