On Saturday 21 June 2014 21:55, wrote:
> I can only guess Kenji's reasons, but I believe it's related to
> DIP49, which he created:
>
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP49
Thanks a bunch. That sheds quite some light on it.
I'd still appreciate feedback on this.
bump
Anyone?
Last week I filed issues 12883 [1] and 12884 [2], and made dmd pull request
#3654 [3] to fix them. The changes would make it possible to use alias this
for implicit conversion to mutable when the conversion is otherwise not
possible.
Issue 12883 is about structs. dmd's current rules for convers
On Saturday 13 April 2013 23:24, Nils Boßung wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I just noticed that I have a couple of open pull requests open for
> Deimos/ncurses. They have been sitting there for three months without any
> reaction.
> Could someone have a look? And maybe you should check
Hey guys,
I just noticed that I have a couple of open pull requests open for
Deimos/ncurses. They have been sitting there for three months without any
reaction.
Could someone have a look? And maybe you should check your notification
settings?
Walter Bright wrote:
> Unfortunately, it'll have to be rewritten to be GPL. I don't control the
> Symantec license.
Too bad. That means, ldc should get rid of it, too; doesn't it?
Hello? Is this thing on?
I'm trying to bring @cmdfile functionality to gdmd. I looked at ldc's ldmd,
and they simply use dmd's root/response.c. Could I just include it in gdc,
too?
response.c itself says:
> * This source file is made available for personal use
> * only. The license is in backendlicense.txt
> * For any o
10 matches
Mail list logo
