== Quote from Max Samukha (spam...@d-coding.com)'s article
> Not that I fiercely disagree but ideally I'd want it to be obliterated
> to an invalid but easily recognizable state. It might help to discover
> dangling pointer errors early. Otherwise, leaving a destroyed object in
> a perfectly valid
== Quote from Peter Alexander (peter.alexander...@gmail.com)'s article
> What is the plan for this library? Will the std.algorithm start to use a
> mixture of iterators and ranges (as it should, in my opinion)?
As far as anyone not coming from C++ is concerned, ranges == iterators.
Assuming you'r
