On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 at 04:32:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
...
I'm _very_ much against having normal warnings which are things
which don't
definitively need to be fixed, because otherwise you get into
the situation
where people ignore them, and the quality of the software
suffers, because
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 23:25:56 UTC, bearophile wrote:
So what do you think about having "-wi" (and even -property
too) on default in D (and have a compiler switch to disable
warnings on request)?
It sounds like a good idea to me, I'm all for it. The more
warnings i get, the less probable i
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 12:36:18 UTC, Roald Ribe wrote:
If you are interested in getting results rather than
reinventing the wheel,
I would advice you to have a look at the openwatcom.org wlink,
and the
forked jwlink as a starting point. The linker is open source,
written in
C and has user do
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 23:47:26 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Imho changing dmd to use COFF (incl. 64 support) instead of
that crappy OMF would be more beneficial than yet another
linker.
I'd love to, but i don't think i can spend a whole summer doing
that ;)
If you do write a linker then make
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 22:53:03 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Absolutely possible, though too late for this year's GSoC. If
you're still interested in working on it for GSoC 2013 (if
Google decides to do another GSoC (which they most likely
will)), then be sure to submit a proposal!
Too
Hi!
I'm interested in starting a project to make a linker besides
optlink for dmd on windows. If possible it'd be cool to run it as
a gsoc-project, but if that's not an option I'll try to get it
admitted as a soc-project at my university.
Anyway, the project would aim to be a replacement or
