Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Errors that we can eliminate by changing the design of the
language, we should so eliminate (unless their costs
make the language unuseable, obviously).
So are you returning to the very bad design error in switch
statements? ;) Silent
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:20090411030416.ga22...@homero.springfield.home...
BTW, is there any real interest in adding some more power to the GC
implementator to allow some kind of moving or generational collector?
What I mostly want/need from the GC would be
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Speaking of which (damn ranting and subject changing!) I think the
Medieval Ages were a stain on our history. I read somewhere how at the
beginning of that dark time there was actual *loss* of technology: they
had these aquaducts and pumps and mechanisms and whatnot
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:gpu1sn$sn...@digitalmars.com...
Denis Koroskin wrote:
That was less than a week ago. I'd say that this type of bugs will live
as long as C++ lives.
The thing is, even if the programmer *intended* to put the ; there, it
looks
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org kirjoitti viestissä
news:glqt38$14p...@digitalmars.com...
So please let's vote once and for all. No choice will please everybody,
but I want to settle for something that at least won't displease the most
vehement ones :o).
I'll vote for
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:gk1dag$pt...@digitalmars.com...
I keep thinking I should put on a Compiler Construction seminar!
A net-seminar, please, so that those of us who want to attend actually can.
