Re: Why do you write D2 compiler using C++ language?

2014-12-15 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 00:58:29 UTC, uri wrote: On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 16:44:09 UTC, ddj wrote: On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 23:02:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On 12/13/2014 10:55 PM, ddj wrote: But so many issues and bug fixes scares me from using it. That's just the

Re: Why do you write D2 compiler using C++ language?

2014-12-14 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 23:02:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On 12/13/2014 10:55 PM, ddj wrote: But so many issues and bug fixes scares me from using it. That's just the wrong way to look at it. Take a look at the bug list for gcc, any of the Java compilers, or clang. Are you afraid

Why do you write D2 compiler using C++ language?

2014-12-13 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
You already have better D1.

Re: Why do you write D2 compiler using C++ language?

2014-12-13 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
number of issues and bug fixes stabilize to about one per month Thanks On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 12:27:01 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:38:47 + ddj via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: You already have better D1. as D2 wasn't created from

Re: Why do you write D2 compiler using C++ language?

2014-12-13 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
But then you miss all great features of D, all protection from bugs that D offers, like contracts and tests! Initial saving time cost more in long term On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 12:19:19 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: On 14/12/2014 12:38 a.m., ddj wrote: You already have better D1.

Re: Why do you write D2 compiler using C++ language?

2014-12-13 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
nobody forces you to use current developement versions. stick with the version of your choice (2.066 for example), that's all. Unfortunately it is unclear to me how many current bugs/issues are related to stable version. On another side, I do not like to use stable but crippled version

Re: D3

2014-12-13 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 20:21:51 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote: On 12/8/14, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: It seems that D3 is already available: https://github.com/mbostock/d3 Guess we'll just have to skip a number and call the next D

Re: Why do you write D2 compiler using C++ language?

2014-12-13 Thread ddj via Digitalmars-d
Unfortunately it is unclear to me how many current bugs/issues are related to stable version. On another side, I do not like to use stable but crippled version there are some fixes that are going to 2.066, and there is the plan to eventually release 2.066.1 (already here), 2.066.2, etc. with