== Quote from Adam D. Ruppe (destructiona...@gmail.com)'s article
The problem with BSD/GPL code in the main Phobos is any D program will link
with
it, and thus the license goes viral to all D programs.
But since this is just interface files, separate from the stdlib aside from
sharing a
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
eaturbrainz
Back in the day I was writing a kernel, and having to
rewrite queues for every single type of thing I wanted
to queue, or use type-casts to enforce strong typing
of queue elements at runtime, was annoying
== Quote from div0 (d...@sourceforge.net)'s article
On 12/11/2010 13:21, div0 wrote:
On 12/11/2010 04:01, jfd wrote:
Help, anyone? Thank you.
The easiest way is to simply compile a one liner C module.
Then you get all the necessary stuff included and all the irritating
macros
== Quote from Sean Kelly (s...@invisibleduck.org)'s article
In Go code, the only place you typically see semicolons is
separating the clauses of for loops and the like; they are not
necessary after every statement
To me, what they're saying is that their syntax is broken and so it
forces a
I was trying to translate Apache module include files to D, but it soon leads
to a labyrinth of tangled nested #includes and #define and typedef's. The
tools, `dmc -c -e -l', htod, etc. immediately choked. It is getting really,
really,... time consuming, and the words man years flashes before my
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
On 2010-11-10 20:12, Steve Teale wrote:
In the Apache mod_d thread I saw:
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libhello.so.0 -o libhello.so.0.0 libhello.a
Has anyone tried this with libphobos2.a?
Phobos cannot currently be used as a dynamic
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
On 2010-11-09 01:37, JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a C function. I've
figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function
Any thoughts on parallel programming. I was looking at something about Chapel
and X10 languages etc. for parallelism, and it looks interesting. I know that
it is still an area of active research, and it is not yet (far from?) done,
but anyone have thoughts on this as future direction? Thank
Can't DMD already compile D code embedded in HTML:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/html.html ?
I tried the sample at the link, but got error. I also tried it without the HTML
code inside. Am I missing something?
$ dmd hello.html
Error: module hello html source files is deprecated hello.html
A potential mod_d Apache module would go a long way to promote D language to
the web application world.
But it seems that implementing a mod_d Apache module may require that C
instantiates a D language interpreter (similar to Py_NewInterpreter() for
Python), or do the functionality of RDMD with
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a C function. I've figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function to be callable
from
C, so that was easy. Also, Apache expects .so shared library, and one
11 matches
Mail list logo
