Walter Bright Wrote in message:
> On 8/27/2014 12:50 PM, Idan Arye wrote:
>> Aren't these the patent numbers?
>
> Nope. Too many digits. Tried them, the form rejected them.
>
Spoke too soon. A patent number has not been issued as far as I
can tell.
This is listed in the application database.
Walter Bright Wrote in message:
> On 8/27/2014 12:50 PM, Idan Arye wrote:
>> Aren't these the patent numbers?
>
> Nope. Too many digits. Tried them, the form rejected them.
>
Application number : 13/734750
Patent number: 0196008
--
"Dicebot" Wrote in message:
> What keeps bothering me is this: imagine something has not passed
> vote for std.experimental inclusion. That means that some changes
> will happen, one more voting and it will eventually get there one
> release later.
>
> And if has passed the vote, effectively
"Dicebot" Wrote in message:
> On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 17:35:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>> I'd just want to have a simple litmus test that prevents
>> std.experimental from becoming a dumping ground of unfinished
>> work. Consider:
>>
>> "Folks, here's std.experimental.acme. I thin
