Just a heads up, chrome is throwing a virus detected error in the
dmd-2.071.1.exe file.
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 19:03:14 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On my machine (OS X), this program eats up memory with no end
in sight
import std.concurrency;
import core.stdc.stdio;
void start()
{
while(true)
{
receive(
(int msg)
{
char[2]
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 19:34:18 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 19:32:39 UTC, luminousone wrote:
Its the nature of being compatible with C, it might not be
explicitly stated in the spec, but the only place to put the
vtable pointer and stay compatible with C
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 18:58:25 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 18:23:11 UTC, default0 wrote:
Regarding C++ I found this to be a fun read:
http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/ :-)
A lot of it makes sense... C++ is what happens when you evolve,
evolve, evolve and evolve a
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 16:48:16 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 16:38:07 UTC, luminousone wrote:
easy to implement. In C++ the exact position of the vtable
depends on what is in the base most class, it might be 8bytes
in, maybe 20, maybe 200, you just don't know,
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 16:10:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 16:03:44 UTC, luminousone wrote:
C++ post pended vtable pointers, Are not implementation
dependent.
I don't know what «post pended vtable pointers» means. Which
section of the C++ spec are you
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 15:59:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 15:54:16 UTC, luminousone wrote:
C++ has post pended vtable pointers on class objects, its
unlikely good reflection can ever be added to the language, as
the vtable may be in a different place in
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 06:16:57 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 05:33:24 UTC, luminousone wrote:
On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 22:32:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/26/2016 10:18 AM, Enamex wrote:
- template arguments that accept constant values of any
type
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 15:16:19 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 14:57:10 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
I forgot. No it's not more readable, to the contrary. The
issue is that normally { } introduces an indentation, which is
always associated with some kind of
On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 22:32:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/26/2016 10:18 AM, Enamex wrote:
- template arguments that accept constant values of any type
whatsoever
'template';
Still adding D features, I see!
Now if only they could bring over some of D's superior template
syntax,
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 08:23:56 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 02.10.2015 um 10:15 schrieb Kagamin:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 08:03:03 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 02-Oct-2015 10:49, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
vibe.d compatible
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
vibe.d compatible
On Thursday, 20 August 2015 at 17:13:33 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Hi All!
Does GC scan manually allocated memory?
I want to use huge manually allocated hash tables and I don't
want to GC scan them because performance reasons.
Best regards,
Ilya
Yes, just don't store any GC managed
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 17:05:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
My work on allocators takes the last turn before the straight
line. I've arranged with Dicebot to overlap the review period
with finalizing details so I can act on feedback quickly.
After that I'm ready for some major library
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:38:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14641
Manu, our resident god of vector instructions, do you want to
take this on?
Looking at that code, I would think that some well placed
prefetch and Non Temporal move intrinsic's,
On Friday, 20 February 2015 at 10:05:34 UTC, francesco.cattoglio
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 18:14:19 UTC, luminousone
wrote:
HSA does work with discrete gpu's and not just the embedded
stuff, And I believe that HSA can be used to accelerate OpenCL
2.0, via copyless cache coherent
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 15:15:21 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
It strikes me that D really ought to be able to work with GPGPU
– is
there already something and I just failed to notice. This is
data
parallelism but of a slightly different sort to that in
std.parallelism.
std.concurrent,
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 07:32:53 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 7/11/2014 8:22 p.m., luminousone wrote:
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 07:08:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 7/11/2014 7:58 p.m., luminousone wrote:
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 06:42:24 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On
I have been working on a media library, it still has a long way
to go, but I figured its about time I shared what I am doing.
https://github.com/luminousone/dmedia
If I could possibly convince a few people out their to give'er a
once over.
I use XCB/XLIB/GLX directly, so I am not just
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 06:29:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 7/11/2014 6:56 p.m., luminousone wrote:
I have been working on a media library, it still has a long
way to go,
but I figured its about time I shared what I am doing.
https://github.com/luminousone/dmedia
If I could
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 06:42:24 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 7/11/2014 7:38 p.m., luminousone wrote:
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 06:29:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 7/11/2014 6:56 p.m., luminousone wrote:
I have been working on a media library, it still has a long
way to go,
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 07:08:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 7/11/2014 7:58 p.m., luminousone wrote:
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 06:42:24 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 7/11/2014 7:38 p.m., luminousone wrote:
On Friday, 7 November 2014 at 06:29:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 18:18:18 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/05/2014 10:12 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 18:10:38 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
If so, then that push_back would be adding an incomplete
object to the
list.
scope(success)?
I really like that!
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 19:05:32 UTC, Patrick Jeeves
wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 18:56:08 UTC, luminousone
wrote:
unless delete is explicitly called, I don't believe the
destructor would ever be called, it would still have a
reference in the static foo_list object that
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 20:31:54 UTC, Patrick Jeeves
wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 19:44:57 UTC, luminousone
wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 19:05:32 UTC, Patrick Jeeves
wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 18:56:08 UTC, luminousone
wrote:
unless delete is
On Sunday, 21 September 2014 at 22:17:59 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 08:49:38AM +, via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Sunday, 21 September 2014 at 00:07:36 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Saturday, 20 September 2014 at 12:39:23 UTC, Tofu Ninja
wrote:
What
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 01:04:35 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 10.07.2014 02:58, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Am 10.07.2014 02:30, schrieb luminousone:
he links are clicked they simply don't do anything,
the load function is not called. And it doesn't seem to throw
any
errors in chromes devel
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:21:40 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.07.2014 03:54, schrieb luminousone:
There is lots of missing little bits here and their, password
hashing
functions that use crypt_(C) formated hashes.
I was hoping for dauth [1] to fill that gap. It doesn't use the
same
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:21:40 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.07.2014 03:54, schrieb luminousone:
There is lots of missing little bits here and their, password
hashing
functions that use crypt_(C) formated hashes.
I was hoping for dauth [1] to fill that gap. It doesn't use the
same
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:51:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.07.2014 21:21, schrieb luminousone:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:21:40 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.07.2014 03:54, schrieb luminousone:
There is lots of missing little bits here and their,
password hashing
functions
On Thursday, 10 July 2014 at 00:02:23 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 10.07.2014 01:27, schrieb luminousone:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:51:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.07.2014 21:21, schrieb luminousone:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:21:40 UTC, Sönke Ludwig
wrote:
Am 09.07.2014
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 20:39:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
There's been some discussion about vibe.d recently on reddit
(e.g.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2a20h5/wired_magazine_discovers_d/cir9443)
and I was wondering to what extent that's meaningful:
has anyone ever
On Sunday, 11 May 2014 at 17:36:44 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 12 May 2014 02:38, Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Am Sun, 11 May 2014 14:52:50 +1000
schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
On 11 May 2014 05:39, H. S. Teoh via
33 matches
Mail list logo
