Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Denis Koroskin wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:22:00 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Walter has magically converted his work on T[new] into work on making
>>> associative arrays true templates defined in druntime and not
>>> considered very special
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> rmcguire wrote:
>> Wouldn't opIn be more useful if it returned a range starting with
>> the element that was found?
>
> Thought about that, but it's hard to justify. Items aren't sorted in any
> particular order, so you&#x
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> grauzone wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Pelle Månsson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>> On 23/10/2009 13:02, bearophile wrote:
>>> Chris Nicholson-Sauls:
>>>
I prefer this (Scala):
list = list
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Don wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Don wrote:
[I'm moving this from deep inside a TDPL thread, since I think it's
important]
is(typeof(XXX)) is infamously ugly and unintuitive
__traits(compiles, XXX) is more comprehensible, but jus
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>>> Well, if that's a problem you could fix it by making immutable not
>>> shared unless you also put the shared attribute:
>>>
>>> immutable Object o;// thread-local
>>> shared immutable Object o; // visible from all threads
>>
>>
Justin Johansson wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>
>> When I originally worked out ideas for D, there were many requests from
>> the C and C++ community for a 'strong' typedef, and so I put one in D. I
>> didn't think about it too much, just assumed that it was a good idea.
>>
>> Now I'm not s
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> rmcguire wrote:
>> Justin Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> Walter Bright Wrote:
>>>
>>>> When I originally worked out ideas for D, there were many requests from
>>>> the C and C++ community for a 'strong'
