On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 10:14:25 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
Yeah, that's what I couldn't remember. I'll dig up the
discussion read up on it again.
These two DIPs drafts also try to tackle the attribute problem:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP64
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP79
On 9/28/16 11:48 AM, ZombineDev wrote:
AFAIR, last year or so, Andrei approved the proposal for attr(bool
expr), eg:
@nogc:
// no gc code here
@nogc(false):
Yah, we've got to have something. There's been quibbles over syntax but
nothing better came up that is as comprehensive. @nogc(true)
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 09:48:27 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
AFAIR, last year or so, Andrei approved the proposal for
attr(bool expr), eg:
Yeah, that's what I couldn't remember. I'll dig up the discussion
read up on it again.
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 09:48:27 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 09:43:38 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
[...]
AFAIR, last year or so, Andrei approved the proposal for
attr(bool expr), eg:
@nogc:
// no gc code here
@nogc(false):
// code that's allowed to use
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 09:43:38 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
Let's try this again.
This attribute block can be terminated by a corresponding
protection attribute block:
// Begin private
private:
void foo() {}
// End private
public:
void bar() {}
But not all attributes have a cor
Let's try this again.
This attribute block can be terminated by a corresponding
protection attribute block:
// Begin private
private:
void foo() {}
// End private
public:
void bar() {}
But not all attributes have a corresponding attribute to turn
them off:
// Begin @nogc
@nogc:
...
Given
public:
