On 30/03/2014 12:58, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 11:49:43 UTC, logicchains wrote:
Interesting project: write a Go package manager in D. The reaction
would be hilarious, if nothing else.
For an added bonus extend dub to support it. And in doing so make it so
you can
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 16:01 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
They are quite interesting to follow, given some of the more opinionated
long time community members.
For those not following golang-nuts, the above is a wonderfully
understated comment. This is very much the English/Stephen Fry use of
On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 20:54:54 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/30/2014 10:01 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if anyone would care, if the language wasn't
sponsored by Google.
Isn't that pretty much the main reason it ever got any
attention in the first place? Not to be
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 16:54 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/30/2014 10:01 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if anyone would care, if the language wasn't
sponsored by Google.
Isn't that pretty much the main reason it ever got any attention in the
first place? Not to be
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 09:18:08 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 16:01 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
They are quite interesting to follow, given some of the more
opinionated long time community members.
For those not following golang-nuts, the above is a wonderfully
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 13:01 +, John Colvin wrote:
[…]
Syntax notwithstanding, do you see any reason why goroutine-style
CSP couldn't be implemented as a library in D?
I know little about this area but at a brief glance it doesn't
seem a particularly difficult problem.
Syntactically
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 09:18:08 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP)
a formal language for describing patterns of interaction in
concurrent systems?
Am 31.03.2014 11:17, schrieb Russel Winder:
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 16:01 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
Whether Rust turns into a disturbance in the C/C++/D/Go force, we
shall see.
Actually as a ML fan I follow Rust development closely and think it
could get a piece of the systems pie.
The
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 14:42 +, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 09:18:08 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP)
a formal language for describing patterns of interaction in
concurrent systems?
Which is why a framework realizing CSP for real
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 17:26 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
Actually as a ML fan I follow Rust development closely and think it
could get a piece of the systems pie.
I too am following Rust development (*): never a day goes by without me
having to rewrite my codes due to all the changes ;-)
Am 31.03.2014 18:49, schrieb Russel Winder:
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 17:26 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
Actually as a ML fan I follow Rust development closely and think it
could get a piece of the systems pie.
I too am following Rust development (*): never a day goes by without me
having to
Interesting project: write a Go package manager in D. The
reaction would be hilarious, if nothing else.
On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 11:49:43 UTC, logicchains wrote:
Interesting project: write a Go package manager in D. The
reaction would be hilarious, if nothing else.
For an added bonus extend dub to support it. And in doing so make
it so you can D-Go and Go-D.
Because why not, must be doable!
Am 29.03.2014 20:24, schrieb Bruno Medeiros:
On 22/03/2014 14:36, Russel Winder wrote:
There has been a long running thread on the Go list about needing a
...
(Note: I'm basing this on what has been said here regarding Go... I
haven't checked the Go discussions myself, so that's why I wonder
On 3/30/2014 10:01 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if anyone would care, if the language wasn't
sponsored by Google.
Isn't that pretty much the main reason it ever got any attention in the
first place? Not to be snide, just that that's been my observation.
On 22/03/2014 14:36, Russel Winder wrote:
There has been a long running thread on the Go list about needing a
package manager, the nay sayers claim there is need for one as Go source
can import packages from Git (also Mercurial, and also Bazaar)
repositories. Someone posting this about Rust just
On Saturday, 22 March 2014 at 16:23:31 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Dub was a very good decision.
The logo is... unfortunate. As in, OGC-level unfortunate.
https://www.google.com/search?safe=offsite=tbm=ischsource=hpq=OGC
Cannot unsee.
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 10:01:32 UTC, Messenger wrote:
On Saturday, 22 March 2014 at 16:23:31 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Dub was a very good decision.
The logo is... unfortunate. As in, OGC-level unfortunate.
https://www.google.com/search?safe=offsite=tbm=ischsource=hpq=OGC
Cannot unsee.
There has been a long running thread on the Go list about needing a
package manager, the nay sayers claim there is need for one as Go source
can import packages from Git (also Mercurial, and also Bazaar)
repositories. Someone posting this about Rust just to keep the
discussion going I think.
The
Am 22.03.2014 15:36, schrieb Russel Winder:
There has been a long running thread on the Go list about needing a
package manager, the nay sayers claim there is need for one as Go source
can import packages from Git (also Mercurial, and also Bazaar)
repositories. Someone posting this about Rust
On 3/22/14, 7:36 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
There has been a long running thread on the Go list about needing a
package manager, the nay sayers claim there is need for one as Go source
can import packages from Git (also Mercurial, and also Bazaar)
repositories. Someone posting this about Rust just
21 matches
Mail list logo
