On 25/03/2011 08:45, Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to load/save popular
image
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:45:35 +0200, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+spam@com.gmail wrote:
On 25/03/2011 08:45, Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so
On 25/03/2011 08:45, Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to load/save popular
image
On 24/03/2011 18:54, Trass3r wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
BTW, students are free (in fact a bit encouraged according to some
organizations) to bring forth their own ideas. It is of course better if
the student is involved
Daniel Gibson Wrote:
Am 25.03.2011 07:08, schrieb Kagamin:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
I wouldn't think that the GPL would be a problem for build tools. It (and
LGPL) _is_ a problem for libraries, but you're not linking with tools or
generally doing anything with their code. You're just
Trass3r Wrote:
Am 25.03.2011, 00:52 Uhr, schrieb Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com:
I can see using MinGW's tools as a dead-end, rather than a step in the
right
direction. (Besides, wouldn't DMD Windows have to output object files in
COFF format?)
Care to elaborate?
Yes, outputting
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 25/03/2011 08:45, Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
I wouldn't think that the GPL would be a problem for build tools. It (and
LGPL) _is_ a problem for libraries, but you're not linking with tools or
generally doing anything with their code. You're just using them.
Well, if Digital Mars doesn't plan to redistribute
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to load/save popular
image formats from/to RGB pixel arrays
Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to load/save popular
image formats from/to RGB
Am 25.03.2011 07:08, schrieb Kagamin:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
I wouldn't think that the GPL would be a problem for build tools. It (and
LGPL) _is_ a problem for libraries, but you're not linking with tools or
generally doing anything with their code. You're just using them.
Well, if Digital
Am 25.03.2011 07:08, schrieb Kagamin:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
I wouldn't think that the GPL would be a problem for build tools. It
(and LGPL) _is_ a problem for libraries, but you're not linking with
tools or generally doing anything with their code. You're just using
them.
Well,
Not to mention, didn't someone find a linker that can link both COFF and
OMF
files on Windows and mostly works with dmd (IIRC, the debugging symbols
don't
currently work)? That sounds a lot more desirable than dealing with the
GNU
tools on Windows (which already have the whole COFF vs OMF
On 2011-03-25 16:58, Trass3r wrote:
Not to mention, didn't someone find a linker that can link both COFF and
OMF
files on Windows and mostly works with dmd (IIRC, the debugging symbols
don't
currently work)? That sounds a lot more desirable than dealing with the
GNU
tools on Windows
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another opinion,
so what about:
- helping with getting dmd produce x64 code on Windows.
To quote Walter:
To do 64 bits on Windows requires:
1. 64 bit OMF
2. 64 bit librarian
3. 64 bit generating dmd
4. 64 bit C compiler
5. 64 bit
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to load/save popular image
formats from/to RGB pixel arrays would be a great start,
On 24/03/2011 19:39, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to load/save popular
image formats from/to
Trass3r Wrote:
1. 64 bit OMF
2. 64 bit librarian
3. 64 bit generating dmd
4. 64 bit C compiler
5. 64 bit symbolic debug info
6. 64 bit debugger
7. 64 bit C runtime
The first step would be to examine if MinGW's tools could be used.
No way. They're GPL.
GDC and LDC theoretically
On 2011-03-24 22:16, Simon wrote:
On 24/03/2011 19:39, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too - how about an image library? Being able to
On 3/24/11 10:31 PM, Kagamin wrote:
The first step would be to examine if MinGW's tools could be used.
No way. They're GPL.
So?
David
On 24/03/2011 21:35, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-24 22:16, Simon wrote:
On 24/03/2011 19:39, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:54:56 +0200, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote:
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion, so what about:
Me too -
On 2011-03-24 15:04:45, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 3/24/11 10:31 PM, Kagamin wrote:
The first step would be to examine if MinGW's tools could be used.
No way. They're GPL.
So?
I wouldn't think that the GPL would be a problem for build tools. It (and
LGPL) _is_ a problem for libraries,
On 3/24/2011 7:26 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-03-24 15:04:45, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 3/24/11 10:31 PM, Kagamin wrote:
The first step would be to examine if MinGW's tools could be used.
No way. They're GPL.
So?
I wouldn't think that the GPL would be a problem for build tools.
== Quote from Trass3r (u...@known.com)'s article
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another opinion,
so what about:
- helping with getting dmd produce x64 code on Windows.
To quote Walter:
To do 64 bits on Windows requires:
1. 64 bit OMF
2. 64 bit librarian
3. 64 bit
Am 25.03.2011, 00:52 Uhr, schrieb Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com:
== Quote from Trass3r (u...@known.com)'s article
I don't want to edit the ideas wiki page without getting another
opinion,
so what about:
- helping with getting dmd produce x64 code on Windows.
To quote Walter:
To do 64 bits on
25 matches
Mail list logo
