On 10.12.2016 00:25, qznc wrote:
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:25:49 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:01:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/functional.html
What about python and javascript?
Python and Javascript are mixed paradigm languages. You coul
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:25:49 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:01:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/functional.html
What about python and javascript?
Python and Javascript are mixed paradigm languages. You could
argue if purity and immutabilit
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:01:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/functional.html
What about python and javascript?
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:01:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
What is your definition of Functional Programming? Mine:
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/functional.html
I think, it's more about being declarative.
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 09:58:27 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Functional doesn't imply purity and immutability
I disagree.
What is your definition of Functional Programming? Mine:
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/articles/functional.html
Functional doesn't imply purity and immutability, and mutable
functional has cognitive problems: mutation is important, but
functional code is too high level, so whatever happens is hidden
from the programmer; D suffers from this too as people are
confused whether ranges are taken by value or b
On Thursday, 8 December 2016 at 13:40:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2016/05/disadvantages-of-purely-functional.html
-- Andrei
Great Find! Thanks for sharing it.
This article expresses in nice words what is wrong with
mono-paradigm languages.
Performan
http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2016/05/disadvantages-of-purely-functional.html
-- Andrei