On 16 November 2015 at 09:30, Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:49:57 +0100
> schrieb Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
> :
>
> > There should be ways to catch ABI changes in the build or test process.
> > Maybe I'm misremembering something th
Am Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:49:57 +0100
schrieb Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
:
> There should be ways to catch ABI changes in the build or test process.
> Maybe I'm misremembering something though. :-)
>
> There should be a degree of ABI compatibility between releases for plain
> static functions - a
On 16 Nov 2015 8:15 am, "Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> Am Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:26:54 +
> schrieb Marc Schütz :
>
> > I'm interested in this topic, too. Has there been a conclusion as
> > to distributions should install includes and libraries of
> > diff
On 16 Nov 2015 7:35 am, "Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> Am Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:24:18 +
> schrieb Chris Piker :
>
> > On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > > I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
> >
Am Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:26:54 +
schrieb Marc Schütz :
> I'm interested in this topic, too. Has there been a conclusion as
> to distributions should install includes and libraries of
> different compilers (and versions), which sonames to use, etc?
The shared library topic was too hot back the
Am Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:24:18 +
schrieb Chris Piker :
> On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
> > poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
> > results to create a similar experien
On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 17:24:19 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=5282814
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:34:25 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:01:34 +0100
> schrieb Marco Leise :
>
> > Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:03:42 +0100
> > schrieb Marco Leise :
> >
> > > Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
> > > schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> > >
> > > > AFAIK you can't put
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:01:34 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise :
> Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:03:42 +0100
> schrieb Marco Leise :
>
> > Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
> > schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> >
> > > AFAIK you can't put shared libraries into a different folder.
> > > The runtime linker must be able
Am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:03:42 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise :
> Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
> schrieb Johannes Pfau :
>
> > AFAIK you can't put shared libraries into a different folder.
> > The runtime linker must be able to find the libraries so the folders
> > have to be registered in ld.so.c
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:35:22 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> AFAIK you can't put shared libraries into a different folder.
> The runtime linker must be able to find the libraries so the folders
> have to be registered in ld.so.conf. But ld 'virtually merges' all
> directories so you still can't ha
On Nov 14, 2013 8:40 PM, "Johannes Pfau" wrote:
>
> Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:02:46 +0100
> schrieb Marco Leise :
>
> > Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:11:17 +0100
> > schrieb "Dejan Lekic" :
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to be limite
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:02:46 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise :
> Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:11:17 +0100
> schrieb "Dejan Lekic" :
>
> > On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't want to be limited to one installation of Phobos.
> > > That's why there is no "none
On 12/11/13 20:50, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
I'm not sure a poll is the appropriate way to decide this, to be honest.
Am Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:11:17 +0100
schrieb "Dejan Lekic" :
> On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> >
> > I don't want to be limited to one installation of Phobos.
> > That's why there is no "none" option. It is required to have
> > e.g.:
> > /usr/include/dlang/dmd-1.
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 13:50:45 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:23:17 +0100
schrieb "Dejan Lekic" :
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise
wrote:
> I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
> poll. Everyone assembling Linux packa
On 12/11/13 21:06, Dicebot wrote:
"dlang" should supersede "d" in all domains, it is a simple matter of ambiguity
(I, personally, won't change it whatever poll results are)
I suggest the opposite -- if "d" is up for grabs, we should grab it and hold on
to it. Ambiguity is best overcome by cre
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 15:07:57 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
That requires co-operation from upstream compiler projects...
distributors
are free to have local patches by all means to force the
compilers to look
in non-standard directories. ;-)
Well, you have co-operated with me willingl
On 13 November 2013 13:53, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>
>> I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language doesn't seem
>> important to me.
>>
>> I also place the source under /usr/src since they actually aren't
>> headers/imp
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:53:10 +0100
schrieb "Dicebot" :
> On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips
> wrote:
> > I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language
> > doesn't seem important to me.
> >
> > I also place the source under /usr/src since they actually
>
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:23:17 +0100
schrieb "Dejan Lekic" :
> On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
> > poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
> > results to create a similar experien
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 04:35:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I don't see why we need such sub-directories. The language
doesn't seem important to me.
I also place the source under /usr/src since they actually
aren't headers/import files.
Mostly hygiene concerns. One of reasons why C
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=52828149e
Am Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:35:10 +0100
schrieb "Jesse Phillips" :
> On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:06:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> >> I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
> >> poll. Everyone assembling Linux
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:06:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 19:50:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=52828149e
I've seen people use both 'd' and 'dlang' now, so I created a
poll. Everyone assembling Linux packages is then free use the
results to create a similar experience on all distributions.
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=52828149e4b06cfb69b97527
--
Marco
28 matches
Mail list logo