Is D2 suitable to implementing the W3C specifications
for XPath 2.0, and particularly the XPath & XQuery Data
Model (XDM), with both coding succinctness and runtime
time and space efficiency?
The reference links to the W3C specs are as follows:
XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0 (Second Edition)
http
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:46:31 -0500, Justin Johansson wrote:
Is D2 suitable to implementing the W3C specifications
for XPath 2.0, and particularly the XPath & XQuery Data
Model (XDM), with both coding succinctness and runtime
time and space efficiency?
[snip]
For this. First we would need a be
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:19 -0500, Yao G. wrote:
[ . . . ]
> For this. First we would need a better module to manipulate XML files than
> the one in std.xml.
The Python community seem to be gravitating towards using lxml which
wraps libxml2 and libxslt. If D can make calls to C libraries why
re
Justin Johansson Wrote:
> Is D2 suitable to implementing the W3C specifications
> for XPath 2.0, and particularly the XPath & XQuery Data
> Model (XDM), with both coding succinctness and runtime
> time and space efficiency?
First you should implement DOM. The hardest part will be standard complia
Le 14/09/2010 06:58, Russel Winder a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:19 -0500, Yao G. wrote:
[ . . . ]
For this. First we would need a better module to manipulate XML files than
the one in std.xml.
The Python community seem to be gravitating towards using lxml which
wraps libxml2 and libxslt.
On 14/09/2010 12:16 AM, Justin Johansson wrote:
Is D2 suitable to implementing the W3C specifications
for XPath 2.0, and particularly the XPath & XQuery Data
Model (XDM), with both coding succinctness and runtime
time and space efficiency?
Now, by suitability, I don't mean if it can be done. Of
