[dox] List of Phobos documentation improvement candidates (Was: Re: Can we get a forum section devoted to documentation? [dox])

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Andre Artus wrote: > On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 18:09:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu > wrote: [...] > >Things should happen organically, i.e. creating a specialized > >group should follow a need substantiated by increased volume of > >specialized discussion

Re: [dox] List of Phobos documentation improvement candidates (Was: Re: Can we get a forum section devoted to documentation? [dox])

On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 20:03:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Andre Artus wrote: On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 18:09:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: [...] >Things should happen organically, i.e. creating a specialized >group should follow a need subst

Re: [dox] List of Phobos documentation improvement candidates (Was: Re: Can we get a forum section devoted to documentation? [dox])

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:23:28PM +0200, Andre Artus wrote: > On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 20:03:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: [...] > > http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/index.html [...] > There is a script running on the page you linked to that is making > my browser misbehave. It's probably no

Re: [dox] List of Phobos documentation improvement candidates (Was: Re: Can we get a forum section devoted to documentation? [dox])

On Friday, August 16, 2013 15:43:39 H. S. Teoh wrote: > And maybe then, I might actually turn on JS for dlang.org again. Or not, > depending on whether that ugly unreadable blob of links at the top of > every Phobos page is still there. Sigh... the things you have to do > these days to make the web