On 10/08/2010 04:29 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
I just made some functional changes to how priority messages are sent and added
a few performance tweaks to messaging in general. The only visible
difference should be that PriorityMessageException is no longer a template
class but instead contains a V
== Quote from Sean Kelly (s...@invisibleduck.org)'s article
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
> > osa Wrote:
> >
> > > I started using std.concurrency in some projects and overall it feels
> > > like a solid (albeit minimalistic) design. However, current
> > > implementation has some issues. For example, I've no
osa Wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 03:33 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> > osa Wrote:
> >>
> >> I've also thought about switching to 'send' if the receiver queue is
> >> empty, but there is no way in std.concurrency API to check for that. Is
> >> there any serious issue with adding such method? I understand that
On 09/30/2010 03:33 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
osa Wrote:
I've also thought about switching to 'send' if the receiver queue is
empty, but there is no way in std.concurrency API to check for that. Is
there any serious issue with adding such method? I understand that in
multi-threaded environment an e
osa Wrote:
>
> I've also thought about switching to 'send' if the receiver queue is
> empty, but there is no way in std.concurrency API to check for that. Is
> there any serious issue with adding such method? I understand that in
> multi-threaded environment an empty queue as told by 'isEmpty'
On 09/30/2010 01:45 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Benchmark: 5944400 iterations in 5 seconds (1.1e+06/second) -- built
without -version=priority
Benchmark: 4900 iterations in 5.119 seconds (957.218/second) -- build with
-version=priority before fix
Benchmark: 39700 iterations in 5.001 seconds (7938
Sean Kelly Wrote:
> osa Wrote:
>
> > I started using std.concurrency in some projects and overall it feels
> > like a solid (albeit minimalistic) design. However, current
> > implementation has some issues. For example, I've noticed that using
> > prioritySend slows everything considerably.
>
osa Wrote:
> I started using std.concurrency in some projects and overall it feels
> like a solid (albeit minimalistic) design. However, current
> implementation has some issues. For example, I've noticed that using
> prioritySend slows everything considerably.
Thanks for this. I can tell you
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:31:53 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:25:07 -0400, osa wrote:
P.S. demangle program example at
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_demangle.html is broken --
it does not compile.
P.P.S. std.demangle fails for some symbols, for e
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:25:07 -0400, osa wrote:
P.S. demangle program example at
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_demangle.html is broken --
it does not compile.
P.P.S. std.demangle fails for some symbols, for example:
_D3std5array13__T5emptyTyaZ5emptyFNdxAyaZb
_
I started using std.concurrency in some projects and overall it feels
like a solid (albeit minimalistic) design. However, current
implementation has some issues. For example, I've noticed that using
prioritySend slows everything considerably. Here is a simple benchmark
to demonstrate the proble
11 matches
Mail list logo
