you
could add paths using the same interface regardless of which
linker you are using. I'd expect the argument to be something
like:
-libpath=
The disadvantage is it would be another command line option
added to DMD. If there is general agreement that this is a
desirable feature, I'
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 10:23:08 UTC, Tony wrote:
There is a tool that lets you call GDC and use DMD command-line
options (gdmd). If it doesn't already exist, what about a tool
that allows you to call DMD using GDC options (which I think
are the same as gcc/g++/clang/clang++)?
I
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 02:21:14 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
If we added a new "linker-independent" flag to dmd, then you
could add paths using the same interface regardless of which
linker you are using. I'd expect the argument to be something
like:
r you are using. I'd expect the argument to be something
like:
-libpath=
The disadvantage is it would be another command line option
added to DMD. If there is general agreement that this is a
desirable feature, I'll go ahead and implement it.
Given the current state of things, and
r you are using. I'd expect the argument to be something
like:
-libpath=
The disadvantage is it would be another command line option
added to DMD. If there is general agreement that this is a
desirable feature, I'll go ahead and implement it.
no one responded to this, but I thought
specified. If you have a .def file, then you can't add any
library search paths :)
If we added a new "linker-independent" flag to dmd, then you
could add paths using the same interface regardless of which
linker you are using. I'd expect the argument to be something
li
