Re: -v for error only

2018-06-19 Thread DigitalDesigns via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 19 June 2018 at 12:44:26 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: On Tuesday, 19 June 2018 at 08:40:03 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote: There needs to be a switch, if their isn't one already, where only errors are verbose. When I use the -v switch it not only expands the error trace like it should

Re: -v for error only

2018-06-19 Thread Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 19 June 2018 at 08:40:03 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote: There needs to be a switch, if their isn't one already, where only errors are verbose. When I use the -v switch it not only expands the error trace like it should but also adds all kinds of additional meaningless info(semantic3,

-v for error only

2018-06-19 Thread DigitalDesigns via Digitalmars-d
There needs to be a switch, if their isn't one already, where only errors are verbose. When I use the -v switch it not only expands the error trace like it should but also adds all kinds of additional meaningless info(semantic3, module list, etc). All this additional information is generally