On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 05:34:08 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 11:22:40 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
Nick
I don't have current performance results because I've been
focused on adding features, but these results were taken on a
previous version:
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 13:48:38 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 05:34:08 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 11:22:40 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
Thanks for the responses and your details replies.
I'm going to talk to the CEO of the company described, at the
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 11:22:40 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
Nick
I don't have current performance results because I've been
focused on adding features, but these results were taken on a
previous version:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
So now I can build a full web application/server executable in
less than 2mb packed, and it runs faster than anything out
there.
Etienne
Do you have an performance numbers, as to how fast your web
application/server is, or is
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 06:26:39 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
So now I can build a full web application/server executable in
less than 2mb packed, and it runs faster than anything out
there.
Etienne
Do you have an performance
On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 06:32:31 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
Etienne
Would you like to detail what still needs to be completed/on
the to-do list ?
What would be the best way to learn it ?
Does it need documentation as well ?
you should stay with PHP + C# or migrated to pure C# if you need to ask
such a question here (without giving any infos about what the co-workers
understand, the real size of the project is, etc.)
Am 16.06.2015 um 01:53 schrieb Nick B:
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Any idea how far away it might be from being something that
someone could use in an enterprise environment simply, in the
same kind of way that vibed is easy? I
On Sunday, 21 June 2015 at 03:16:31 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 11:28:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:23:25 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon
wrote:
Will you explain how it is different to Vibe.d ?
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 11:28:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:23:25 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
Will you explain how it is different to Vibe.d ?
It has HTTP/2, a new encryption library, it uses a native
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:23:25 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
Any idea how far away it might be from being something that
someone could use in an enterprise environment
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 11:29:58 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 11:28:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:23:25 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon
wrote:
[...]
Also, the HTTP client has a cookiejar
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 11:35:07 UTC, Suliman wrote:
2. new encryption library does it's written entirely in D and
do all that do OpenSSL?
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mc0a99$2bfn$1...@digitalmars.com
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:23:25 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
Any idea how far away it might be from being something that
someone could use in an enterprise environment
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 11:28:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 05:23:25 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
[...]
Etienne -
Interesting back story.
Will this be under a Boost licence ?
Will you provide a link ?
It has HTTP/2, a new encryption library, it uses a native TCP
event library, lots of refactoring. In short, the entire thing
is in D rather than linking with OpenSSL and libevent.
It's MIT licensed. I have it here:
https://github.com/etcimon/vibe.d
Cool!
1. Do you plain to merge it's with
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 11:35:07 UTC, Suliman wrote:
It has HTTP/2, a new encryption library, it uses a native TCP
event library, lots of refactoring. In short, the entire thing
is in D rather than linking with OpenSSL and libevent.
It's MIT licensed. I have it here:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 07:34:28 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
Any chance you could write a bit more on this? Your personal
story and why you believe this. We
On 06/19/2015 07:28 AM, Etienne Cimon wrote:
The dub.json uses relative paths though while I'm developing. You're
free to adjust the file and try it,
You may want to consider just using dub's (add|remove)-local for that
instead. You can rip those path elements out of dub.json completely,
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 15:31:19 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 06/19/2015 07:28 AM, Etienne Cimon wrote:
The dub.json uses relative paths though while I'm developing.
You're
free to adjust the file and try it,
You may want to consider just using dub's (add|remove)-local
for that
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Any chance you could write a bit more on this? Your personal
story and why you believe this. We could post on the Wiki as
part of a series of narratives on people
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 16:28:42 UTC, Etienne wrote:
I've been working on developing the entire Web Stack in D, down
from the kernel to the multiplexed HTTP/2 protocol and the
high-level framework that queries the database and serves the
response in json.
Your work looks very
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 02:01:33 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Yes I too would be interested on more background as to your
opinion, as why its 20 years ahead of everything else out there.
Natively compiled: Moore's law predicts that the burden in
advancements in computing speed will migrate into
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:44:08 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Any idea how far away it might be from being something that
someone could use in an enterprise environment simply, in the
same kind of way that vibed is easy? I
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 16:28:42 UTC, Etienne wrote:
I've been working on developing the entire Web Stack in D,
down from the kernel to the multiplexed HTTP/2 protocol and
the high-level framework that queries the database
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:40:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Any idea how far away it might be from being something that
someone could use in an enterprise environment simply, in the
same kind of way that vibed is easy? I appreciate that making
it broadly usable may not be what interests
On 17/06/2015 5:40 p.m., Nick B wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 04:51:44 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 17/06/2015 6:41 a.m., Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 06:29:46 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
Oh please say Christchurch!
sorry for the confusion. Its Wellington.
Ahh right
On 2015-06-16 01:53, Nick B wrote:
Looking to the future, as volumes grow, they could:
1. Stay with PHP C#.net, and bring on servers as volumes grow.
2. Migrate to C#.net in time
3. Migrate to D in time.
Any comments or suggestions on the above?
Anything would be better than PHP. You
Am Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:53:04 +
schrieb Nick B nick.barbal...@gmail.com:
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some dealings with
at present. They have build most of their original code in PHP,
(as this was quick and easy) but they also use some C#.net for
interfacing to
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 04:25:38 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 08:47:40 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 15 June 2015 at 23:53:06 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Hi.
Any comments or suggestions on the above?
Both C# and D sound like good fits there. It depends on
whether it's
On 06/17/2015 12:25 AM, Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 08:47:40 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 15 June 2015 at 23:53:06 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Hi.
Any comments or suggestions on the above?
Both C# and D sound like good fits there. It depends on whether it's
the sort of team who
On 06/17/2015 02:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-16 01:53, Nick B wrote:
Looking to the future, as volumes grow, they could:
1. Stay with PHP C#.net, and bring on servers as volumes grow.
You mentioned cost elsewhere, and this can be a big cost that doesn't
scale very well.
2.
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 06:29:46 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/06/2015 11:53 a.m., Nick B wrote:
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some dealings
with at
present. Any comments or suggestions on the above?
Hello follow Kiwi!
Hello kiwi from the south Island. :)
On Monday, 15 June 2015 at 23:53:06 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Looking to the future, as volumes grow, they could:
1. Stay with PHP C#.net, and bring on servers as volumes
grow.
2. Migrate to C#.net in time
3. Migrate to D in time.
Any comments or suggestions on the above?
Don't mess up a
On 17/06/2015 6:41 a.m., Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 06:29:46 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/06/2015 11:53 a.m., Nick B wrote:
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some dealings with at
present. Any comments or suggestions on the above?
Hello follow Kiwi!
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 04:51:44 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 17/06/2015 6:41 a.m., Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 06:29:46 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
Oh please say Christchurch!
sorry for the confusion. Its Wellington.
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 08:47:40 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 15 June 2015 at 23:53:06 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Hi.
Any comments or suggestions on the above?
Both C# and D sound like good fits there. It depends on whether
it's the sort of team who like to innovate and explore new
On 16/06/2015 11:53 a.m., Nick B wrote:
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some dealings with at
present. They have build most of their original code in PHP, (as this
was quick and easy) but they also use some C#.net for interfacing to
accounting appls on clients machines. The
First off I would stress that architecture and process are more
important than which of those 3 languages you choose, i.e. good
testing (I prefer test driven), continuous integration, and a
solid architecture that you are confident will provide the
reliability, correctness and uptime that you
On Monday, 15 June 2015 at 23:53:06 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some dealings
with at present. They have build most of their original code in
PHP, (as this was quick and easy) but they also use some C#.net
for interfacing to accounting appls on
On Monday, 15 June 2015 at 23:53:06 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some dealings
with at present. They have build most of their original code in
PHP, (as this was quick and easy) but they also use some C#.net
for interfacing to accounting appls on
Hi.
There is a startup in New Zealand that I have some dealings with
at present. They have build most of their original code in PHP,
(as this was quick and easy) but they also use some C#.net for
interfacing to accounting appls on clients machines. The core PHP
application runs in the cloud
42 matches
Mail list logo
