On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 18:16:01 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/24/2016 3:35 AM, Tomer Filiba wrote:
...
Our configuration is a struct of several static hash tables
(allocated in-place, not via GC). So the entire configuration
is contiguous in memory
...
If I understand you correctly,
Maybe you can merge this: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6081
On 8/24/2016 3:35 AM, Tomer Filiba wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:38:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
2) Many times I need memory-contiguity, e.g., several big arrays inside a
struct, which is dumped to disk/sent over network. I can't use pointers there.
I don't know why pointers cannot
On 8/24/2016 3:55 AM, Tomer Filiba wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:38:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
1) Why? I know everything in compile-time, why force me to (A) allocate it
separately in `shared static this()`
I'm not sure how that hurts anything. It's just a call to malloc().
Sta
On 8/24/2016 3:35 AM, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:38:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I don't know why pointers cannot be used.
In my code I have a line like this:
static immutable MyStruct[] data = [ MyTemplate!MyArgs ];
This would not work if `MyStruct.sizeof *
100% agree this limit should be removed. We do have a workaround
with dynamic arrays, but that doesn't justify not fixing the
problem.
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:38:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
1) Why? I know everything in compile-time, why force me to (A)
allocate it
separately in `shared static this()`
I'm not sure how that hurts anything. It's just a call to
malloc().
Static this()es require a topological order
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:38:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
2) Many times I need memory-contiguity, e.g., several big
arrays inside a
struct, which is dumped to disk/sent over network. I can't use
pointers there.
I don't know why pointers cannot be used. Can you show the
struct definit
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:38:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I don't know why pointers cannot be used.
In my code I have a line like this:
static immutable MyStruct[] data = [ MyTemplate!MyArgs ];
This would not work if `MyStruct.sizeof *
MyTemplate!MyArgs.length` is bigger than 16MB,
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 09:24:57 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
I think change that to:
@property ref T[N] slice() {
That would obviously not work, since the *type* T[N] cannot exist
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 07:50:25 UTC, Tomer Filiba wrote:
#WEKA #INDUSTRY
I found this post from 2007
http://forum.dlang.org/post/fdspch$d3v$1...@digitalmars.com that
refers to this post from 2006
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/37038.html#N37071 -- and I still don
On 8/24/2016 12:50 AM, Tomer Filiba wrote:
As for the "use dynamic arrays instead", this poses two problems:
1) Why? I know everything in compile-time, why force me to (A) allocate it
separately in `shared static this()`
I'm not sure how that hurts anything. It's just a call to malloc().
and
On 24/08/16 12:08, Tomer Filiba wrote:
@property T[] slice() {
I think change that to:
@property ref T[N] slice() {
Shachar
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 08:34:24 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
You're welcome to fix optlink
https://github.com/DigitalMars/optlink
Or write a whole new linker.
Of course there is no reason to not change this for -m32mscoff
and -m64 on Windows at least that I am aware of.
I'm running
On 24/08/2016 7:50 PM, Tomer Filiba wrote:
#WEKA #INDUSTRY
I found this post from 2007
http://forum.dlang.org/post/fdspch$d3v$1...@digitalmars.com that refers to
this post from 2006
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/37038.html#N37071 --
and I still don't realize, why do static
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 at 07:50:25 UTC, Tomer Filiba wrote:
#WEKA #INDUSTRY
I found this post from 2007
http://forum.dlang.org/post/fdspch$d3v$1...@digitalmars.com that
refers to this post from 2006
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/37038.html#N37071 -- and I still don
#WEKA #INDUSTRY
I found this post from 2007
http://forum.dlang.org/post/fdspch$d3v$1...@digitalmars.com that
refers to this post from 2006
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/37038.html#N37071 -- and I still don't realize, why do static arrays have this size limit on them?
An
17 matches
Mail list logo
