Re: 2.0.64 progression

2013-12-10 Thread bearophile
H. S. Teoh: So this isn't a regression; it's *pro*gression! (And on that note, I'd like to propose that code breakage of this sort *should* be allowed in D. While we *should* be stabilizing the language, I don't think it's right to go to the opposite extreme of hindering language fixes just

2.0.64 progression

2013-12-10 Thread H. S. Teoh
This morning I decided to use 2.0.64 (well actually, git HEAD) to recompile a project that's been on the backburner for a while, and at first it appeared as though a regression has occurred, as dmd spewed out a screenful of compile errors. Upon closer inspection, though, the errors were caused by