On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 19:34:53 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 19:15:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I wasn't familiar with version(release). Would you need to
compile with -version=release then?
No, it seems to work with just the -release flag.
The Python
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:28:12 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I
made a bugzilla issue.
Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode, you
can mark it with the debug keyword. But, there is currently no
way to mark
On 09/04/2015 04:53 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Normally, the only code differences between release mode and non-release
mode relate to extra correctness checking - like with assertions - which
get stripped out in release mode for efficiency.
Failing assertions have been redefined to be
On 09/02/2015 06:32 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:28:10PM +, Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I made a
bugzilla issue.
Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode, you can
On 09/02/2015 06:28 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I made a
bugzilla issue.
Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode, you can mark
it with the debug keyword. But, there is currently no way to mark a
statement so that it
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:28:10PM +, Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I made a
> bugzilla issue.
>
> Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode, you can mark it
> with the debug keyword. But, there is
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I
made a bugzilla issue.
Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode, you
can mark it with the debug keyword. But, there is currently no
way to mark a statement so that it only runs in release. So what
I propose is a
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:40:04 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:28:12 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I
made a bugzilla issue.
Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode,
you can mark it
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:28:12 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I
made a bugzilla issue.
Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode, you
can mark it with the debug keyword. But, there is currently no
way to mark
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:40:04 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:28:12 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I
made a bugzilla issue.
Currently in D, to have a statement run only in debug mode,
you can mark it
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 17:03:18 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:40:04 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:28:12 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
I wanted some second opinions on an idea I had for D before I
made a bugzilla issue.
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 19:34:53 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 19:15:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I wasn't familiar with version(release). Would you need to
compile with -version=release then?
No, it seems to work with just the -release flag.
The Python
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 17:14:27 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 17:03:18 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:40:04 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 16:28:12 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
I wanted some second
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 19:15:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I wasn't familiar with version(release). Would you need to
compile with -version=release then?
No, it seems to work with just the -release flag.
The Python programmer in me hates the inconsistency between these
two, but it's fine.
14 matches
Mail list logo
