On Tue, 10 May 2011 21:54:30 -0400, Jonathan Crapuchettes
jcrapuchet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I have been working with a lot of associative arrays of late and been
running into some problems with the built-in implementation. It appears
that very heavy use in an application can cause
Please ignore my last question. I think I had worked on the problem too long
last night.
Thanks,
JC
On 5/10/2011 9:54 PM, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
Hey all,
I have been working with a lot of associative arrays of late and been
running into some problems with the built-in implementation. It appears
that very heavy use in an application can cause the garbage collector to
have issues. Most of
1. I will give you implementation a try.
2. I have been compiling with 64-bit as I expect most of the programs I write
require more than 4GB of memory.
Thanks!
dsimcha wrote:
On 5/10/2011 9:54 PM, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
Hey all,
I have been working with a lot of associative arrays of
== Quote from Jonathan Crapuchettes (jcrapuchet...@gmail.com)'s article
1. I will give you implementation a try.
2. I have been compiling with 64-bit as I expect most of the programs I write
require more than 4GB of memory.
Thanks!
Unfortunately RandAA doesn't work on 64-bit yet, though the
Wow! When is the next release planned? Is it worth my trying the beta?
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jonathan Crapuchettes (jcrapuchet...@gmail.com)'s article
1. I will give you implementation a try.
2. I have been compiling with 64-bit as I expect most of the programs I write
require more than
== Quote from Jonathan Crapuchettes (jcrapuchet...@gmail.com)'s article
Wow! When is the next release planned? Is it worth my trying the beta?
You probably shouldn't try the betas. DMD betas are very short (usually on the
order of a week or less) and are designed so that library writers and
BTW, I've updated RandAA for 64-bits if you want to try it out. The
updates were rather trivial and I meant to do them a long time ago.
On 5/11/2011 1:49 PM, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
Wow! When is the next release planned? Is it worth my trying the beta?
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from
Thank you, but I figured out a way to significantly reduce the number of AAs
that were in use in my program and that seems to have helped it and sped it up a
bit.
The next problem that I just ran into really doesn't make sense and I'm hoping
that you can help me. I'm getting segfaults in the
Hey all,
I have been working with a lot of associative arrays of late and been running
into some problems with the built-in implementation. It appears that very heavy
use in an application can cause the garbage collector to have issues. Most of
the time I have found ways around the problems,
10 matches
Mail list logo
