On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:39:25 -0400, dsimcha wrote:
> On 6/24/2011 9:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
>> Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing. The library documentation
>> seems more readable as well (in my humble opinion)!
>
> Just one point I wanted to take this opportunity to mention:
>
> std.pa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6219
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On 2011-06-27 04:31, Thomas Mader wrote:
> > There is a small error on the index page.
>
> If you see any errors on the website, you should report them in bugzilla:
> d.puremagic.com/issu
On 2011-06-27 04:31, Thomas Mader wrote:
> There is a small error on the index page.
If you see any errors on the website, you should report them in bugzilla:
d.puremagic.com/issues
- Jonathan M Davis
On Jun 27, 11 19:32, Thomas Mader wrote:
ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader mailto:thomas.ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There is a small error on the index page.
There are currently four implementations:
/"There are currentl
ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader wrote:
> There is a small error on the index page.
>
> There are currently four implementations:
> *"There are currently four implementations:"*
>
> but there are only *three* implementations listed.
There is a small error on the index page.
There are currently four implementations:
*"There are currently four implementations:"*
but there are only *three* implementations listed.
Thomas
> There are currently four implementationsc
>
There are currently four implementations:
There are currentl
On 6/24/2011 9:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble
opinion)!
Just one point I wanted to take this opportunity to mention:
std.parallelism and std.net.isemail **STILL** aren't up on the new webs
On 6/24/2011 6:25 PM, Lloyd Dupont wrote:
Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble opinion)!
I like it too! Thanks to David, Andrei, and all who helped create it.
Congrats, looks much nicer and appealing.
The library documentation seems more readable as well (in my humble
opinion)!
