Re: Abstract DDoc output for better document generation

2014-05-18 Thread Tolga Cakiroglu via Digitalmars-d
Also see https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox for DDOC compatible documentation generator that uses the JSON output. However, due to various shortcomings, of which not all are easy to resolve, I'm planning to instead directly use a D parser at some point. Yes, this seems like a good too

Re: Abstract DDoc output for better document generation

2014-05-18 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
Am 17.05.2014 20:28, schrieb Mason McGill: On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 18:03:53 UTC, Tolga Cakiroglu wrote: After having some experience with documentation generation from dmd command like, and seeing outputs, I wasn't satisfied with it. Other alternatives as Doxygen is available, though it pars

Re: Abstract DDoc output for better document generation

2014-05-17 Thread Mason McGill via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 17 May 2014 at 18:03:53 UTC, Tolga Cakiroglu wrote: After having some experience with documentation generation from dmd command like, and seeing outputs, I wasn't satisfied with it. Other alternatives as Doxygen is available, though it parses codes itself that is not based on what

Re: Abstract DDoc output for better document generation

2014-05-17 Thread bearophile via Digitalmars-d
Tolga Cakiroglu: After having some experience with documentation generation from dmd command like, and seeing outputs, I wasn't satisfied with it. What problems have you found in that output? Bye, bearophile

Abstract DDoc output for better document generation

2014-05-17 Thread Tolga Cakiroglu via Digitalmars-d
After having some experience with documentation generation from dmd command like, and seeing outputs, I wasn't satisfied with it. Other alternatives as Doxygen is available, though it parses codes itself that is not based on what version of DMD is installed on system. Since the structure of DDoc