On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 14:50:37 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 01:58:17 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and
classes and other stuff. Then you
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 01:58:17 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and
classes and other stuff. Then you can just filter that.
'dmd -X' looks like the perfect
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 13:17:42 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
You don't have to remove the brackets. You just have to process
the result correctly. It's not an object but an array with an
object as its first element.
ok. I think I demonstrated that I don't know what I'm doing with
the
On 02/22/2018 12:54 PM, psychoticRabbit wrote:
module test;
import std.stdio, std.file, std.json;
void main()
{
string myFile= "source.json"; // a file produced by: dmd -o- -X
source.d
string js = readText(myFile);
JSONValue j = parseJSON( js[1..$-1] ); // why do I have to
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 11:32:59 UTC, rjframe wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:41:48 +, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and
classes and other stuff. Then you can just
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:41:48 +, psychoticRabbit wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and classes and
>> other stuff. Then you can just filter that.
>
> do you know why the first and last
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and
classes and other stuff. Then you can just filter that.
do you know why the first and last character of the output from
"dmd -o- -X somefile.d" are [ and ] with all
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:15:57 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given
compilers in many languages do not.
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:15:57 UTC,
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 01:53:42 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:40:16 UTC, bauss wrote:
I should probably have put an example usage to show how it's
used:
This makes we want to go back and program in C again ;-)
(but thanks for taking the
On 2/20/18 8:53 PM, psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:40:16 UTC, bauss wrote:
I should probably have put an example usage to show how it's used:
This makes we want to go back and program in C again ;-)
(but thanks for taking the time to demo/explain)
Mixins
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and
classes and other stuff. Then you can just filter that.
'dmd -X' looks like the perfect solution for my need. thanks.
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:40:16 UTC, bauss wrote:
I should probably have put an example usage to show how it's
used:
This makes we want to go back and program in C again ;-)
(but thanks for taking the time to demo/explain)
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:27:08 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
so.. in that case..another idea...how about a compiler option
to output a list of functions. (I don't really expect many will
warm to that idea.)
Does anyone know of any tool that could do such a thing?
I just want of a
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:15:57 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given
compilers in many languages do not.
A lot of dynamic languages do too
def foo(): #
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:15:57 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given
compilers in many languages do not.
Would this be a useful feature in D?
Everything else
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 13:04:42 psychoticRabbit via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
>
> wrote:
> > fn string creater() pure {
> >
> > return "void func() {}";
> >
> > }
> >
> > so now I'm just looking for lines that begin with fn.
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:39:17 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:45:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
mixin(creator());
That is why.
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:45:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
mixin(creator());
That is why. There are plenty of functions, classes and
structs that simply
psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
So the point is moot.
ok. I've come around... and the point reall is moot.
so.. in that case..another idea...how about a compiler option to output a
list of functions. (I don't really expect many
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
So the point is moot.
ok. I've come around... and the point reall is moot.
so.. in that case..another idea...how about a compiler option to
output a list of functions. (I don't really expect many will warm
to that idea.)
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
fn string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
so now I'm just looking for lines that begin with fn. the mixin
doesn't matter.
oh... I think I might have misunderstood your point ... due to
not understanding
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:45:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
mixin(creator());
That is why. There are plenty of functions, classes and structs
that simply won't exist in the form of syntax until you execute
CTFE.
I think
On 20/02/2018 12:35 PM, psychoRabbit wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
You need a fully implemented frontend to get anything proper in terms
of parsing for D.
We're not talking about syntax highlighting here.
So the point is moot.
Why is the point
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
You need a fully implemented frontend to get anything proper in
terms of parsing for D.
We're not talking about syntax highlighting here.
So the point is moot.
Why is the point (about being able to more easily find
On 20/02/2018 12:15 PM, psychoticRabbit wrote:
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given compilers in
many languages do not.
Would this be a useful feature in D?
Everything else seems to have an
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given
compilers in many languages do not.
Would this be a useful feature in D?
Everything else seems to have an annotation (e.g structs,
classes.) So why not
26 matches
Mail list logo
