On 2010-04-12 11:09, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Chris Mueller wrote:
On what OS? On linux, you can do:
time foo
to get the run time for program foo, including elapsed clock time,
time spent in the program itself and time spent in the kernel on
behalf of the program (for I/O, mallocs, etc);
Chris Mueller wrote:
>> On what OS? On linux, you can do:
>>
>> time foo
>> to get the run time for program foo, including elapsed clock time,
>> time spent in the program itself and time spent in the kernel on
>> behalf of the program (for I/O, mallocs, etc);
>>
>> cat /proc/$(pidof foo)/statu
There's the benchmark() function in Phobos:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_date.html#benchmark
Don't know if that's what you're really looking for, though.
...
void bench(R)(string label, R delegate() dg, uint times = 1 ) {
scope pc = new PerformanceCounter;
real time = u
Chris Mueller wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to benchmark some of my D routines for performance testing
> and like to compare it with some alternative implementations in e.g.
> time and memory consumption.
>
> I'm not really experienced in this field and want to ask if someone can
> shar
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 05:27:58 -0300, Chris Mueller
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to benchmark some of my D routines for performance testing
and like to compare it with some alternative implementations in e.g.
time and memory consumption.
I'm not really experienced in this field and
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:27:58 +0200, Chris Mueller
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to benchmark some of my D routines for performance testing
> and like to compare it with some alternative implementations in e.g.
> time and memory consumption.
>
> I'm not really experienced in this
Hi everyone,
I would like to benchmark some of my D routines for performance testing
and like to compare it with some alternative implementations in e.g.
time and memory consumption.
I'm not really experienced in this field and want to ask if someone can
share his knowledge.
Are there som
