Yigal Chripun пишет:
> Weed wrote:
>> Yigal Chripun пишет:
>>> Weed wrote:
bearophile пишет:
> Weed:
>> where else can I use that thing?
> I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral
> numbers. I presume you can use it only when you want to use
> mult
Weed wrote:
Yigal Chripun пишет:
Weed wrote:
bearophile пишет:
Weed:
where else can I use that thing?
I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral
numbers. I presume you can use it only when you want to use
multi-precision integral number :-)
Do you feel the need to use
Yigal Chripun пишет:
> Weed wrote:
>> bearophile пишет:
>>> Weed:
where else can I use that thing?
>>> I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral
>>> numbers. I presume you can use it only when you want to use
>>> multi-precision integral number :-)
>>> Do you feel the
Weed wrote:
bearophile пишет:
Weed:
where else can I use that thing?
I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral numbers. I
presume you can use it only when you want to use multi-precision integral
number :-)
Do you feel the need to use it in other situations too?
I
bearophile пишет:
> Weed:
>> where else can I use that thing?
>
> I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral numbers. I
> presume you can use it only when you want to use multi-precision integral
> number :-)
> Do you feel the need to use it in other situations too?
I th
Weed:
> where else can I use that thing?
I was talking about a built-in syntax for multi-precision integral numbers. I
presume you can use it only when you want to use multi-precision integral
number :-)
Do you feel the need to use it in other situations too?
Bye,
bearophile
bearophile пишет:
> Weed:
>> And another: where else can I apply it?
where else can I use that thing?
>
> Apply what to where?
> (English isn't my first either).
and my too :)
Weed:
> And another: where else can I apply it?
Apply what to where?
(English isn't my first either).
Bye,
bearophile
dennis luehring:
> he just want to avoid the "..." around the number
I know it may seem a small thing, but it allows you to write generic code that
works both with int numbers and Bigint ones, just changing one type, for
example of an alias or a template :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Weed schrieb:
bearophile ÐÉÛÅÔ:
Weed:
It is not enough to make Bigint the object?
I think I have already answered your question (and at the moment BigInt is a
struct, I think).
I did not understand the problem.
You can make an object Bigint. You can add, deduct the value BigInt. You
can
bearophile пишет:
> Weed:
>> It is not enough to make Bigint the object?
>
> I think I have already answered your question (and at the moment BigInt is a
> struct, I think).
I did not understand the problem.
You can make an object Bigint. You can add, deduct the value BigInt. You
can declare t
Weed:
> It is not enough to make Bigint the object?
I think I have already answered your question (and at the moment BigInt is a
struct, I think).
Bye,
bearophile
bearophile пишет:
> Recently we have discussed a lot about the balance of putting things
> inside the language or outside of it. It's a subtle balance and it's
> dynamic too, with time it can change (for example the removal of
> complex numbers from D2?). Surely it will need more discussions in
> t
Recently we have discussed a lot about the balance of putting things inside the
language or outside of it. It's a subtle balance and it's dynamic too, with
time it can change (for example the removal of complex numbers from D2?).
Surely it will need more discussions in the future too.
In the pa
14 matches
Mail list logo
