Please, please just call it libphobos2.a on Linux and move it to the
64bit library directory. On OS X, one might want to build it as
universal binary, so no special casing needed there either. On Windows
it is installed to the DMD directory anyway, so this is probably no
issue either (3d-bit-dm
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:55:42 +0200, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
We already have:
libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
I'd agree that yet another name is not needed, but just
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:55:42 +0200, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
We already have:
libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
I'd agree that yet another name is not needed, but just for fun - you
have ano
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
But since it's just a static library (still, right?)
it's more a question of directories and -L-L DFLAGS
Tango can be built as a dynamic library on Mac OS X since a while, just
waiting for Sean to apply the rest of the patch for druntime (half of
the patch is already a
On 2010-09-06 08:24, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Brad Roberts wrote:
On 9/5/2010 9:39 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
We already have:
libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
No change in name, change in directory holding it.
ie.. lib64/lib
Walter Bright wrote:
We already have:
libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
I'd agree that yet another name is not needed, but just for fun - you
have another moon :) That name would fully reflect feelings of people
fac
On Sep 6, 10 12:39, Walter Bright wrote:
We already have:
libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
There is no need to change the name on Mac OS X because of fat binary.
Brad Roberts wrote:
On 9/5/2010 9:39 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
We already have:
libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
No change in name, change in directory holding it.
ie.. lib64/libphobos*
That's what most major distr
On 9/5/2010 9:39 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> We already have:
>
> libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
> libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
>
> What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
No change in name, change in directory holding it.
ie.. lib64/libphobos*
That's what most major distributions do.
We already have:
libphobos.a Phobos 1, 32 bit
libphobos2.a Phobos 2, 32 bit
What should the 64 bit Phobos be named?
10 matches
Mail list logo
