I don't know if it's really a bug, but the package protection attribute seems
to have a different semantic in the current packages than in nested packages.
For example, say you have the module test which declares the following:
---
module test.Foo;
package uint myVar;
package class MyClass {}
p
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
> I don't know if it's really a bug, but the package protection attribute seems
> to have a different semantic in the current packages than in nested packages.
>
> For example, say you have the module test which declares the following:
> -
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
>> I don't know if it's really a bug, but the package protection attribute
>> seems to have a different semantic in the current packages than in nested
>> packages.
>>
>> For example, say you have the module
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Keep
wrote:
>
>
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Jeremie Pelletier
>> wrote:
>>> I don't know if it's really a bug, but the package protection attribute
>>> seems to have a different semantic in the current packages than in
