Dear D user, i have this code:
import core.sys.windows.windows;
real[] a;
while(1) {
a.length=4096*4096;
a=null;
Sleep(2000);
}
It allocates memory, but its never gets freed, just keep going
up, and after 10 secs, memoryexception is thrown. I checked the
pointer it is
Also forget to mention, that im using DMD 2.066.1.
If i alloc memory with GC.malloc(..), it is handled correcty (and
freed).
Why GC doesn't frees dynamic arrays?
On 1/22/15 8:44 AM, collerblade wrote:
Dear D user, i have this code:
import core.sys.windows.windows;
real[] a;
while(1) {
a.length=4096*4096;
a=null;
Sleep(2000);
}
It allocates memory, but its never gets freed, just keep going up, and
after 10 secs, memoryexception is thrown. I
i tested malloc, and it also run out of mem, except when i
manually free the pointer.
There is no GC im DMD?
Thank all of u,
im going to use malloc.
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 14:19:10 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/22/15 8:44 AM, collerblade wrote:
Dear D user, i have this code:
import core.sys.windows.windows;
real[] a;
while(1) {
a.length=4096*4096;
a=null;
Sleep(2000);
}
It allocates memory, but its never gets
Steven Schveighoffer:
scoped int[] a=new int[whatever_big_size];
...
I would not use this, I think it's scheduled for deprecation,
or at least the meaning is scheduled to change.
As D introduces some limited static management of memory
ownership, the semantics of scoped arrays could be
On 1/22/15 9:40 AM, collerblade wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 14:19:10 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/22/15 8:44 AM, collerblade wrote:
Dear D user, i have this code:
import core.sys.windows.windows;
real[] a;
while(1) {
a.length=4096*4096;
a=null;
Sleep(2000);
}
It
Ok so me and one of my colleagues have been working on some code
at a distance. We both use dmd as the compiler. I am under
Windows, she OSX.
It is not uncommon that she experiences more strictness in the
type system than I do. For example, something like this does
compile for me, but not
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 19:51:48 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Ok so me and one of my colleagues have been working on some
code at a distance. We both use dmd as the compiler. I am under
Windows, she OSX.
It is not uncommon that she experiences more strictness in the
type system than I do.
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 19:56:29 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 19:51:48 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Ok so me and one of my colleagues have been working on some
code at a distance. We both use dmd as the compiler. I am
under Windows, she OSX.
It is not uncommon
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 19:51:48 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Ok so me and one of my colleagues have been working on some
code at a distance. We both use dmd as the compiler. I am under
Windows, she OSX.
It is not uncommon that she experiences more strictness in the
type system than I do.
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 20:05:27 UTC, MacAsm wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 19:51:48 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Ok so me and one of my colleagues have been working on some
code at a distance. We both use dmd as the compiler. I am
under Windows, she OSX.
It is not uncommon that
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 20:28:11 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 20:05:27 UTC, MacAsm wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 19:51:48 UTC, Phil Lavoie
wrote:
Ok so me and one of my colleagues have been working on some
code at a distance. We both use dmd as the
Am Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:30:08 +
schrieb Phil Lavoie maidenp...@hotmail.com:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 20:28:11 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 20:05:27 UTC, MacAsm wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 19:51:48 UTC, Phil Lavoie
wrote:
Ok so me and one
15 matches
Mail list logo
