It appears no syscall is generating EBADF.
Does writeln call into libc's printf() function? That can return EBADF
(bad file number) if the stream isn't enabled for writing.
I didn't look too closely (work issues) at the D code, but I did notice the
D libraries are trying to define the internal s
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 20:26:05 UTC, Jason King wrote:
The first thing I would suggest running the program via truss
and see if
any calls to write() are returning EBADF.. If so, see what fd#
is being
passed (or if something is calling close() on fd1).
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:57 PM, fla
The first thing I would suggest running the program via truss and see if
any calls to write() are returning EBADF.. If so, see what fd# is being
passed (or if something is calling close() on fd1).
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:57 PM, flamencofantasy via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wro
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 19:36:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 15:41:47 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 05:42:33 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
BTW: You can by-pass the Solaris ld by setting environment
variable LD_ALTEXEC to the ld binary you want to use.
Thanks for the
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 15:41:47 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 05:42:33 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
BTW: You can by-pass the Solaris ld by setting environment
variable LD_ALTEXEC to the ld binary you want to use.
Thanks for the tip: I set that to the binutils ld and got
almost all
The NaN and hex formatting are a matter of enabling C99 versions of
*printf() functions. Normally the C compiler does this by linking in the
appropriate /usr/lib/values-*.o file based on the desired compilation mode
(ansi C, c89, c99, etc.) standards(5) goes into more detail on that.
Passing 0 fo
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 05:42:33 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
BTW: You can by-pass the Solaris ld by setting environment
variable LD_ALTEXEC to the ld binary you want to use.
Thanks for the tip: I set that to the binutils ld and got almost
all of druntime's tests to pass with a 64-bit binary. I on
It looks like std/file.d needs to be updated to not use the largefile
definition on 64-bit mode.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:18 AM, flamencofantasy via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the tip!
> I pointed LD_ALTEXEC to the gnu ld like this;
> LD_ALTEXEC=/opt/loca
Thanks for the tip!
I pointed LD_ALTEXEC to the gnu ld like this;
LD_ALTEXEC=/opt/local/x86_64-sun-solaris2.11/bin/ld
Now I can compile and build and run a simple D program with no
imports.
I do get a link error but ld apparently auto corrects it;
[root@smartmachine ~]# dmd hello.d
/opt/loca
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 16:02:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 15:06:24 UTC, flamencofantasy wrote:
Thanks everyone for spending the time on this!
I followed the steps and I got to the same point, that is I
have built DMD, druntime and phobos successfully but linking
fails as p
It's not broken, dmd is emitting an arguably invalid elf section.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Joakim via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 16:02:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 15:06:24 UTC, flamencofantasy wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 16:02:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 15:06:24 UTC, flamencofantasy wrote:
Thanks everyone for spending the time on this!
I followed the steps and I got to the same point, that is I
have built DMD, druntime and phobos successfully but linking
fails as p
As I recall, the problem is the size of the segment (as created by DMD) is
smaller sum of the sizes of the objects in it (which is by ld complains).
You could try binutils, though usually the use of GNU ld on Illumos
platforms is discouraged (as it tends to get lots of things wrong). You
can use e
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 15:06:24 UTC, flamencofantasy wrote:
Thanks everyone for spending the time on this!
I followed the steps and I got to the same point, that is I
have built DMD, druntime and phobos successfully but linking
fails as pointed out previously.
My version of binutils is;
bi
Thanks everyone for spending the time on this!
I followed the steps and I got to the same point, that is I have
built DMD, druntime and phobos successfully but linking fails as
pointed out previously.
My version of binutils is;
binutils-2.24nb3;GNU binary utilities
The latest version seems t
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 07:04:17 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 17:39:02 UTC, flamencofantasy
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use D on SmartOS.
Since there is no binary installer I tried to build DMD from
source by
following the instructions on this page;
http://wiki.dlang.o
On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 07:04:17 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'll finish building phobos and mess around a bit with fixing
those sections. I'll let you know if I get it to work.
Alright, increasing the RAM in my VM got phobos to build.
However, linking sample files and the tests still fail because o
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 17:39:02 UTC, flamencofantasy wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use D on SmartOS.
Since there is no binary installer I tried to build DMD from
source by
following the instructions on this page;
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
Unfortunately I get this error;
[~/d
Note that phobos hasn't been fully tested -- there's probably some fixes
that'll need to happen in there.
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> "flamencofantasy" wrote in message
> news:zhcduibirwprgbzqk...@forum.dlang.org...
>
>
"flamencofantasy" wrote in message
news:zhcduibirwprgbzqk...@forum.dlang.org...
Hello,
I would like to use D on SmartOS.
Since there is no binary installer I tried to build DMD from source by
following the instructions on this page;
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
Unfortunately I get t
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 20:58:57 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
Would it work to first build GDC or LDC ?
(I can build GDC on my PowerMac without having a D compiler
already)
If you can build either of those on a SmartOS host, why bother
with dmd? I don't know if it would work, but I don't believe
The last version in c++ should build.
On May 1, 2015, at 3:58 PM, Jens Bauer via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 17:39:02 UTC, flamencofantasy wrote:
>>> I would like to use D on SmartOS.
>
> SmartOS looks pretty interesting. [see docker.com] :)
> {snip}
>
>>> Unfortun
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 17:39:02 UTC, flamencofantasy
wrote:
I would like to use D on SmartOS.
SmartOS looks pretty interesting. [see docker.com] :)
{snip}
Unfortunately I get this error;
{snip}
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 17:54:00 UTC, Joakim wrote:
dmd git HEAD requires a host D
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 17:54:00 UTC, Joakim wrote:
compiling that on SmartOS with just a C++ compiler. Of course,
the Solaris support in dmd/druntime/phobos is not really
tested, so you may need to fill in some gaps for SmartOS.
I compiled dmd on OpenIndiana (Illumos based like SmartOS
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 17:39:02 UTC, flamencofantasy wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use D on SmartOS.
Since there is no binary installer I tried to build DMD from
source by
following the instructions on this page;
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
Unfortunately I get this error;
[~/d
Hello,
I would like to use D on SmartOS.
Since there is no binary installer I tried to build DMD from
source by
following the instructions on this page;
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
Unfortunately I get this error;
[~/d/dmd/src]# make -f posix.mak MODEL=64
no cpu specified, assuming X8
26 matches
Mail list logo
