On 2013-05-23 16:46, 1100110 wrote:
That was fast.
I'll check it out. Thank you.
Note, if you're using DVM you need to change the build.sh file to use
DMD 2.062. Also, I don't know if there are other hidden compiler errors
in Tango using DMD 2.063.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 05/23/2013 07:33 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-05-23 11:44, 1100110 wrote:
>
>> Hell yeah!
>> I didn't realize dstep was yours.
>>
>>
>> If I can do anything to help, let me know.
>
> It works with DMD 2.062. To get it to work with DMD 2.063 there are is
> regression that needs to be fix
On 2013-05-23 11:44, 1100110 wrote:
Hell yeah!
I didn't realize dstep was yours.
If I can do anything to help, let me know.
It works with DMD 2.062. To get it to work with DMD 2.063 there are is
regression that needs to be fixed for find a workaround for. Tango fails
to compile because of
On 05/23/2013 01:25 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-05-23 00:17, 1100110 wrote:
>
>> hmmm? I never said it was unsuitable, I think you mistaking me for
>> someone else.
>> (I also have no experience with libclang, and I'm tired of manually
>> translating these things... So, am I looking for
On 2013-05-23 00:17, 1100110 wrote:
hmmm? I never said it was unsuitable, I think you mistaking me for
someone else.
(I also have no experience with libclang, and I'm tired of manually
translating these things... So, am I looking for a way to not translate
this? Yes.)
Also I'm pretty sure I
On 2013-05-22 22:17, nazriel wrote:
I am afraid it doesn't build anymore with DMD git-head.
It isn't dstep itself but one of its dependencies.
I wanted to use it in order to create bindings for XCB but couldn't
built it.
Could you use the pre compiled binary in the mean time:
https://github.
On 2013-05-22 22:33, 1100110 wrote:
Yeah, I was afraid of that...
So, Now the next easiest thing is probably SWIG.
Hey, at least give me a change to fix the problem.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 05/22/2013 04:40 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 21:38:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
>> ...
>
> I simply don't understand why do you find libclang unsuitable.
>
hmmm? I never said it was unsuitable, I think you mistaking me for
someone else.
(I also have no experience with libclan
On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 21:38:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
...
I simply don't understand why do you find libclang unsuitable.
On 05/22/2013 04:07 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 20:39:08 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
>> Hmmm... Or you could try using pegged (or CTPG or goldie or dparser).
>>
>> I haven't played with it too much, but there's a C grammar, and it
>> mentions the ability to specify semantic actions, s
On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 20:39:08 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Hmmm... Or you could try using pegged (or CTPG or goldie or
dparser).
I haven't played with it too much, but there's a C grammar, and
it
mentions the ability to specify semantic actions, so That's
like 1/3
of the way to something
Hmmm... Or you could try using pegged (or CTPG or goldie or dparser).
I haven't played with it too much, but there's a C grammar, and it
mentions the ability to specify semantic actions, so That's like 1/3
of the way to something usable.
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki/Semantic-
On 05/22/2013 03:17 PM, nazriel wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 08:10:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2013-05-22 10:05, IgorStepanov wrote:
>>> Is there someone free C++ parser? I want to create simple util to
>>> converting C++ headers to D like htod, but
I'm not sure on how to best bind C++ code to D. D can handle
some parts of the C++ ABI, like classes and virtual functions.
dlang.org contains some information:
Now extern(C++) interface allow to access to virtual and
non-virtual (with final annotation) methods, static methods.
After my pull fo
On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 08:10:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-22 10:05, IgorStepanov wrote:
Is there someone free C++ parser? I want to create simple util
to
converting C++ headers to D like htod, but I want, if it
possible, to
dont write C++ parser. Any ideas?
There&#
On 2013-05-22 20:31, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I accidentally sent the message too soon.
On 2013-05-22 16:55, IgorStepanov wrote:
Seems pretty. What I need to do first to start work over C++ to D
handle? As I think, I'll need to generate to one C++ header one .cpp
glue file (with some hacking ove
On 2013-05-22 16:55, IgorStepanov wrote:
Seems pretty. What I need to do first to start work over C++ to D
handle? As I think, I'll need to generate to one C++ header one .cpp
glue file (with some hacking over header) and one .di file.
I'm not sure on how to best bind C++ code to D. D can hand
On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 08:10:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-22 10:05, IgorStepanov wrote:
Is there someone free C++ parser? I want to create simple util
to
converting C++ headers to D like htod, but I want, if it
possible, to
dont write C++ parser. Any ideas?
There&#
On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 08:05:06 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
Is there someone free C++ parser? I want to create simple util
to converting C++ headers to D like htod, but I want, if it
possible, to dont write C++ parser. Any ideas?
Using libclang is probably most convenient and robust
On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 08:05:06 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
Is there someone free C++ parser? I want to create simple util
to converting C++ headers to D like htod, but I want, if it
possible, to dont write C++ parser. Any ideas?
The easiest thing for you would be to use the GCCXML -
http
On 2013-05-22 10:05, IgorStepanov wrote:
Is there someone free C++ parser? I want to create simple util to
converting C++ headers to D like htod, but I want, if it possible, to
dont write C++ parser. Any ideas?
There's libclang. I already have a tool that handles C and Objective-C
files.
Is there someone free C++ parser? I want to create simple util to
converting C++ headers to D like htod, but I want, if it
possible, to dont write C++ parser. Any ideas?
22 matches
Mail list logo
