On 10.03.2012 21:48, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:21:08PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-10 04:21, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:18:59 +0100, Walter Bright
Yeah, I know, it's viral. Can't do it piecemeal.
Bottom-up instead of top-down?
Hard to find
On 2012-03-10 04:21, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:18:59 +0100, Walter Bright
Yeah, I know, it's viral. Can't do it piecemeal.
Bottom-up instead of top-down?
Hard to find somewhere to start?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:21:08PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-10 04:21, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:18:59 +0100, Walter Bright
Yeah, I know, it's viral. Can't do it piecemeal.
Bottom-up instead of top-down?
Hard to find somewhere to start?
[...]
Not that hard.
On 10-03-2012 18:48, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:21:08PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-10 04:21, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:18:59 +0100, Walter Bright
Yeah, I know, it's viral. Can't do it piecemeal.
Bottom-up instead of top-down?
Hard to find
Still chugging away at implementing AA's in druntime proper, I reviewed
the code for methods that can be marked pure but ran into a major road
block: getHash() is not marked pure. That makes a lot of AA methods
impure, that could, and probably should, be marked pure.
Is it possible to make
On 3/9/2012 1:54 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Still chugging away at implementing AA's in druntime proper, I reviewed
the code for methods that can be marked pure but ran into a major road
block: getHash() is not marked pure. That makes a lot of AA methods
impure, that could, and probably should, be
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 02:01:01PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/9/2012 1:54 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Still chugging away at implementing AA's in druntime proper, I reviewed
the code for methods that can be marked pure but ran into a major road
block: getHash() is not marked pure. That makes a
On 3/9/2012 5:15 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I tried to make getHash() const pure nothrow @safe, but found that in
some places it calls toHash() which isn't marked const pure nothrow
@safe. So I fixed that as well, then found that toHash() calls
toString() which isn't pure, nothrow, nor @safe... and
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:18:59 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/9/2012 5:15 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I tried to make getHash() const pure nothrow @safe, but found that in
some places it calls toHash() which isn't marked const pure nothrow
@safe. So I fixed that as
On 3/9/2012 7:21 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Bottom-up instead of top-down?
both.
10 matches
Mail list logo