On 16-11-2011 00:40, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 15 November 2011 23:21, dsimchadsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
How does the merging process for new Phobos/druntime/DMD front ends work
w.r.t. GDC and LDC? To what extent is it automated? If it's mostly
automated except when things go wrong (or could be
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 10:28:37 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
One thing that confuses me a bit is why GDC and LDC need downstream
copies of druntime/phobos. Couldn't patches that fix the libraries for
certain archs/OSs be sent upstream, in order to reduce merging work and
always provide
How does the merging process for new Phobos/druntime/DMD front ends work
w.r.t. GDC and LDC? To what extent is it automated? If it's mostly
automated except when things go wrong (or could be made so), we should
set up a server somewhere (maybe on one of the DMD tester boxes that's
On 15 November 2011 23:21, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
How does the merging process for new Phobos/druntime/DMD front ends work
w.r.t. GDC and LDC? To what extent is it automated? If it's mostly
automated except when things go wrong (or could be made so), we should set
up a server
On 11/15/2011 03:40 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 15 November 2011 23:21, dsimchadsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
How does the merging process for new Phobos/druntime/DMD front ends work
w.r.t. GDC and LDC? To what extent is it automated? If it's mostly
automated except when things go wrong (or could be
