On Sunday, 2 March 2014 at 17:29:21 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Has anyone investigated whether Dub is an acceptable tool for
use by
Debian and Fedora packagers for building Debian and Fedora
packages?
I would hate to start a D+GtkD project (*) using Dub only to
find that
Debian and Fedora wou
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:35 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:16 +, Francesco Cattoglio wrote:
> > On Sunday, 2 March 2014 at 18:55:46 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > > Waf is packaged by Fedora but not Debian.
> >
> > On a completely unrelated side note: Waf is NOT supposed
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:16 +, Francesco Cattoglio wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 March 2014 at 18:55:46 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > Waf is packaged by Fedora but not Debian.
>
> On a completely unrelated side note: Waf is NOT supposed to be
> packaged at all. Being distributed along with the source
On Sunday, 2 March 2014 at 18:55:46 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Waf is packaged by Fedora but not Debian.
On a completely unrelated side note: Waf is NOT supposed to be
packaged at all. Being distributed along with the sources is part
of the design.
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 09:49 +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
[…]
> Why not both? I don't know about the complexity of your project, but it
> shouldn't be too much hassle to set up build scripts for both systems.
Indeed, I do this for many project.
[…]
> The main hassle I encountered was be
On 02/03/14 19:55, Russel Winder wrote:
Looks like I work with a SCons build (*) and think of switching to Dub
as and when Debian and Fedora package it.
Why not both? I don't know about the complexity of your project, but it
shouldn't be too much hassle to set up build scripts for both system
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 17:42 +, Dicebot wrote:
[…]
> I'd expect it to be rejected until it is in Debian repositories.
> It is a common practice to require build tools only available
> from main repos.
Waf is packaged by Fedora but not Debian. SCons and CMake are packaged
by both. Many Debian
On Sunday, 2 March 2014 at 17:29:21 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Has anyone investigated whether Dub is an acceptable tool for
use by
Debian and Fedora packagers for building Debian and Fedora
packages?
I'd expect it to be rejected until it is in Debian repositories.
It is a common practice to r
Has anyone investigated whether Dub is an acceptable tool for use by
Debian and Fedora packagers for building Debian and Fedora packages?
I would hate to start a D+GtkD project (*) using Dub only to find that
Debian and Fedora would refuse to package the project.
(*) Well actually rewrite a C++
