On 12/18/2012 5:34 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I'll let you all brood over that though, and would welcome any feedback to get
some sort of plan rolling (even if it's just a DIP).
I'm open to pull requests which abstract away some of the differences.
On 12/18/2012 7:06 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/18/2012 5:34 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I'll let you all brood over that though, and would welcome any feedback to get
some sort of plan rolling (even if it's just a DIP).
I'm open to pull requests which abstract away some of the differences.
Th
On 18 December 2012 14:07, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 12/18/12, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > I'd like to get the core developers of D Front-end to
> > work with the people maintaining other such compilers (GDC, LDC,
> > and any others that might come into existance) so that there can
> > genuinely be
On 12/18/12, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I'd like to get the core developers of D Front-end to
> work with the people maintaining other such compilers (GDC, LDC,
> and any others that might come into existance) so that there can
> genuinely be a shared, portable source base for the D Front-end
> code..
On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 at 12:36:31 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 12/18/12, foobar wrote:
Besides, the other compilers merge in the same front-end
code so they'll gain the same feature anyway. There's no gain
in
separating it out to rdmd.
Adding more front-end features adds more work
