Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
Tomek Sowi�ski Wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const
methods on
D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized
method.
But think about D's const -- it's deep, so if a method
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:47:08 -0400, Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr
wrote:
Robert Jacques wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:17:57 -0400, Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods
on D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can
Robert Jacques wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:17:57 -0400, Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods
on D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized method.
But think about D's const -- it's deep, so if a
Brad Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Tomek Sowi?ski wrote:
Dnia 14-06-2010 o 21:27:24 Brad Roberts bra...@slice-2.puremagic.com
napisa?(a):
Const methods only prevent mutating 'this'. You can still call
functions that mutate other state (via globals or passed in arguments).
But
Sean Kelly wrote:
Tomek Sowi�ski Wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods on
D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized method.
But think about D's const -- it's deep, so if a method is const, it can't
possibly mutate its
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods on
D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized method. But
think about D's const -- it's deep, so if a method is const, it can't
possibly mutate its object. So many synchronized const method
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Tomek Sowi?ski wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods on
D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized method. But
think about D's const -- it's deep, so if a method is const, it can't possibly
mutate its
Dnia 14-06-2010 o 21:27:24 Brad Roberts bra...@slice-2.puremagic.com
napisał(a):
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Tomek Sowi?ski wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods
on
D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized method.
But
think
Tomek Sowiński wrote:
3. If answer to 2. is yes, how do we tackle write-starvation? In a
read-mostly scenario the mutating thread may be held up forever.
I'd say that as soon as someone requests the write lock, nobody can
get the read lock anymore. Then when the current readers release
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:17:57 -0400, Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods
on D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized method.
But think about D's const -- it's deep, so if a method is const, it
Tomek Sowiñski Wrote:
This is a continuation of a recent thread Synchronized const methods on
D.learn.
Currently only one thread at a time can execute a synchronized method. But
think about D's const -- it's deep, so if a method is const, it can't
possibly mutate its object. So many
11 matches
Mail list logo
