Don wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I have two more that compliment that. Some people think there writing
"complement" and "they're" correctly but they aren't.
I see what you did there!
It peeked my interest, but it was a mute point.
Well, that point is seperate from m
Don wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I have two more that compliment that. Some people think there writing
"complement" and "they're" correctly but they aren't.
I see what you did there!
It peeked my interest, but it was a mute point.
You mean a moo point, shurely.
Sean Kelly wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I have two more that compliment that. Some people think there writing
"complement" and "they're" correctly but they aren't.
I see what you did there!
It peeked my interest, but it was a mute point.
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
>
> I have two more that compliment that. Some people think there writing
> "complement" and "they're" correctly but they aren't.
I see what you did there!
Mike Parker wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
2009/11/5 Jonas Byström :
Hi,
I had great hope that D within a few years would be the new standard
for people requiring high performance from their language. Then I got
wiser
(http://www.inc.com/magazine/20091101/does-slow-growth-equal-slow-death.html?p
Bill Baxter wrote:
2009/11/5 Jonas Byström :
Hi,
I had great hope that D within a few years would be the new standard for people
requiring high performance from their language. Then I got wiser
(http://www.inc.com/magazine/20091101/does-slow-growth-equal-slow-death.html?partner=fogcreek),
re
2009/11/5 Jonas Byström :
> Hi,
>
> I had great hope that D within a few years would be the new standard for
> people requiring high performance from their language. Then I got wiser
> (http://www.inc.com/magazine/20091101/does-slow-growth-equal-slow-death.html?partner=fogcreek),
> realizing tha
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:46:21 -0500, gzp wrote:
> So please emphasize the wiki4D a little bit more (like in the overview,
> on the future page, so on) on the official page. I think it'd help
> newbies a lot to find informations more easily.
>
> So thanks - this a reason I like D+community, they
Thanks for all. Well, it seems as all of my concerns are answered somewhere on
the net. So than i have only one more request left, please update the web pages
on the http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/... to have references to the more
verbose net sources (and not just at the additional links)
Ex
My first observation is that you are using D2 expecting it to be stable. The
website still doesn't make it clear that D2 should be used for minor tasks to
experiment with the language. That said, I can see the concern that if you code
for D1 you'll still have the incompatibility. But it would st
gzp:
> but by the time I was almost finished, I saw some major
> features are being altered.
The situation is really simple: D2 is alpha state still, don't use it to
develop real code. Use it only if you want to do experiments or if you want to
add things to its std lib. For all other usages u
I've been following D for a while, and I've lost some of my interest too
for several reasons.
The continuous redesign. When I started to implement s/g, I checked
what opportunities I have, what the language specification tells, and
what others did to achieve a similar goal. Then I implemente
12 matches
Mail list logo
