On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:11:41 +0200, Dejan Lekic
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 July 2013 at 08:56:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 21 July 2013 18:07, Suliman wrote:
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
Roadmap for next two years.
Make D2 awesome - Autumn 2013
Make D2 awe
On Tuesday, 23 July 2013 at 08:56:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 21 July 2013 18:07, Suliman wrote:
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
Roadmap for next two years.
Make D2 awesome - Autumn 2013
Make D2 awesome - Winter 2013
Make D2 awesome - Spring 2014
Make D2 awe
On 21 July 2013 18:07, Suliman wrote:
> Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
Roadmap for next two years.
Make D2 awesome - Autumn 2013
Make D2 awesome - Winter 2013
Make D2 awesome - Spring 2014
Make D2 awesome - Summer 2014
Make D2 awesome - Autumn 2014
Make D2 awesom
On Tuesday, 23 July 2013 at 00:12:14 UTC, bearophile wrote:
ixid:
What became of using the comma operator with parens for tuples?
I don't know. But I presume Walter is not interested in
breaking backwards compatibility with C so much.
If that's true, it would be unfortunate. I appreciate t
ixid:
What became of using the comma operator with parens for tuples?
I don't know. But I presume Walter is not interested in breaking
backwards compatibility with C so much.
Bye,
bearophile
On Monday, 22 July 2013 at 17:18:55 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
What are your issues with tuples? Not doubting, genuinely
curious to hear your reasoning.
There's a significant need for a handy safe nice and very
compact syntax to unpack (de-structure) tuples in assignment
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
What are your issues with tuples? Not doubting, genuinely
curious to hear your reasoning.
There's a significant need for a handy safe nice and very compact
syntax to unpack (de-structure) tuples in assignments, foreach
loops and function signatures (and switch cases)
On Monday, 22 July 2013 at 01:15:16 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Lately lot of the D improvement comes from Kenji Hara :-) Kenji
is also my best hope to finally see good tuples in D.
What are your issues with tuples? Not doubting, genuinely curious
to hear your reasoning.
Jesse Phillips:
No. This is becoming dated:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel#Roadmap
That list contains many "Remove x" and "Remove y" but most of
those things seems to hang around nearly forever, they don't even
yet generate deprecation messages... I disagree with this
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 at 17:07:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
No. This is becoming dated:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel#Roadmap
Put it together with the other suggestions and you can kind of
make out a direction
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 at 19:43:56 UTC, Rob T wrote:
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 at 17:07:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
There are the DIP's, which are not exactly a raodmap, but at
least can give you a sense of what the outstanding issues
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 at 17:07:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
There are the DIP's, which are not exactly a raodmap, but at
least can give you a sense of what the outstanding issues are and
what the possible solutions may be.
http://w
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 at 17:07:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
There's the "preapproved" tag for D's Bugzilla, which is used for
issues that have been approved design-wise, but are not
implemented yet:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/bu
Suliman:
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
Nope, sorry.
Bye,
bearophile
Do team have any roadmap for D? I mean Language + standard lib.
15 matches
Mail list logo
